Simulated Impact on LSST Data of Starlink V1.5 and V2 Satellites

Abstract The new Starlink V2 satellites incorporate improvements to the chassis brightness through dielectric mirrors, off-pointing solar arrays, and blackened exposed components. For the general case in which the reflectivities are initially unknown, we simulate Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) operations and repeated photometry of every satellite in simulated model constellations. We derive a brightness model of the Starlink V2 satellite and study the simulated apparent brightness as a function of the satellite position relative to the observer and the Sun. Simulated V2 Starlink satellites appear brightest at two distinct positions in the sky: toward the Sun at low elevations where light is specularly reflected, and nearly overhead where the satellite is closest to the observer. A simulation of Starlink V2 satellites at 550 km height distributed across a series of Walker constellations with varying inclinations was analyzed to study the impact on LSST observations. For every thousand V2 Starlink satellites observed, we find only 0.93 will appear brighter than 7th magnitude. The off-pointed solar array and reduced diffuse reflection of the chassis mitigate the brightness. Finally, we simulate lowering this Walker constellation to 350 km. Only 0.56 V2 Starlink satellites per thousand brighter than 7 AB magnitude will be observed in the first hour at this height. This is a 40% reduction in number of bright satellites entering the focal plane compared to the constellation at 550 km height. We find that a combination of factors yield an apparent surface brightness of these satellites for LSST operations only 5% brighter than at 550 km orbit.

Publication Details

Journal
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ae196c
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulated Impact on LSST Data of Starlink V1.5 and V2 Satellites

The Astronomical Journal
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
article

Simulated Impact on LSST Data of Starlink V1.5 and V2 Satellites

article en

Abstract

Abstract The new Starlink V2 satellites incorporate improvements to the chassis brightness through dielectric mirrors, off-pointing solar arrays, and blackened exposed components. For the general case in which the reflectivities are initially unknown, we simulate Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) operations and repeated photometry of every satellite in simulated model constellations. We derive a brightness model of the Starlink V2 satellite and study the simulated apparent brightness as a function of the satellite position relative to the observer and the Sun. Simulated V2 Starlink satellites appear brightest at two distinct positions in the sky: toward the Sun at low elevations where light is specularly reflected, and nearly overhead where the satellite is closest to the observer. A simulation of Starlink V2 satellites at 550 km height distributed across a series of Walker constellations with varying inclinations was analyzed to study the impact on LSST observations. For every thousand V2 Starlink satellites observed, we find only 0.93 will appear brighter than 7th magnitude. The off-pointed solar array and reduced diffuse reflection of the chassis mitigate the brightness. Finally, we simulate lowering this Walker constellation to 350 km. Only 0.56 V2 Starlink satellites per thousand brighter than 7 AB magnitude will be observed in the first hour at this height. This is a 40% reduction in number of bright satellites entering the focal plane compared to the constellation at 550 km height. We find that a combination of factors yield an apparent surface brightness of these satellites for LSST operations only 5% brighter than at 550 km orbit.

The Astronomical JournalVol. 171(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.