The Irreducible Core of LFP-0: Why Six Fields Plus H Exhaust the Question of Responsibility

Author: Hon Bor So This short technical note argues that the core structure of the LumenFold Protocol (LFP-0) — six semantic fields plus a single ambiguity score H — already exhausts what any high-risk human–AI system can meaningfully record about responsibility at the decision boundary. The six fields (context, AI contribution, human decision or override, data scope, outcome commitment, contestability) form a minimal responsibility surface: every later enquiry about who knew what, when, and under which constraints can be expressed as a projection onto these axes. The ambiguity score H then captures the fragility of the interpretation just before an action is taken. From this perspective, 6+H is implementation-agnostic and reference-invariant: any architecture, including future AGI systems, that wishes to claim full accountability at the human–AI boundary must, in some isomorphic way, reconstruct these six dimensions and this single ambiguity axis. How to cite this project- Project entry point (Root Index): So, Hon Bor. (2025). Master Roadmap and Index for TPT & LFP-0: A Unified Governance Framework for Semantic Accountability in AGI (Root Index v1.0) (v1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17988590 Citing a specific component:Cite the component’s own Zenodo record/DOI (this record), and optionally add: “Indexed in the project Root Index (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17992916).” Author noteAuthor: Hon Bor So. The author also publishes under the name Sing So (Chöndrel Dorje).ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2768-7494Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Zlt8nzcAAAAJ Repository (if applicable): https://github.com/339honbor-gif/LumenFold License clarification: This work provides an analytical and theoretical grounding for theLumenFold Protocol (LFP-0). Although presented in a structured andformal manner, it does not constitute an operational, production-ready,or commercially deployable system. The license shown in the metadata (CC BY 4.0) applies to this theoretical exposition. Any future protocol-level, implementation, or deployment-oriented releases may adopt more restrictive licensingterms, including non-commercial conditions. Earlier versions or files released under different terms remain valid for those specific versions only and are not retroactively altered.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17867544
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Irreducible Core of LFP-0: Why Six Fields Plus H Exhaust the Question of Responsibility

5 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

The Irreducible Core of LFP-0: Why Six Fields Plus H Exhaust the Question of Responsibility

article en
5 citations

Abstract

Author: Hon Bor So This short technical note argues that the core structure of the LumenFold Protocol (LFP-0) — six semantic fields plus a single ambiguity score H — already exhausts what any high-risk human–AI system can meaningfully record about responsibility at the decision boundary. The six fields (context, AI contribution, human decision or override, data scope, outcome commitment, contestability) form a minimal responsibility surface: every later enquiry about who knew what, when, and under which constraints can be expressed as a projection onto these axes. The ambiguity score H then captures the fragility of the interpretation just before an action is taken. From this perspective, 6+H is implementation-agnostic and reference-invariant: any architecture, including future AGI systems, that wishes to claim full accountability at the human–AI boundary must, in some isomorphic way, reconstruct these six dimensions and this single ambiguity axis. How to cite this project- Project entry point (Root Index): So, Hon Bor. (2025). Master Roadmap and Index for TPT & LFP-0: A Unified Governance Framework for Semantic Accountability in AGI (Root Index v1.0) (v1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17988590 Citing a specific component:Cite the component’s own Zenodo record/DOI (this record), and optionally add: “Indexed in the project Root Index (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17992916).” Author noteAuthor: Hon Bor So. The author also publishes under the name Sing So (Chöndrel Dorje).ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2768-7494Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Zlt8nzcAAAAJ Repository (if applicable): https://github.com/339honbor-gif/LumenFold License clarification: This work provides an analytical and theoretical grounding for theLumenFold Protocol (LFP-0). Although presented in a structured andformal manner, it does not constitute an operational, production-ready,or commercially deployable system. The license shown in the metadata (CC BY 4.0) applies to this theoretical exposition. Any future protocol-level, implementation, or deployment-oriented releases may adopt more restrictive licensingterms, including non-commercial conditions. Earlier versions or files released under different terms remain valid for those specific versions only and are not retroactively altered.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Transparency Lab (Netherlands) (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.