S1721 Efficacy and Safety of Novel Biological Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease requiring long-term management. While conventional therapies offer relief for some, many patients remain refractory, prompting a shift toward novel biologics. Recent clinical trials have introduced agents with promising efficacy and safety profiles, but comparative clarity is lacking. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of recently approved biological therapies for moderate-to-severe UC, providing a contemporary synthesis to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched through April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating novel biologics in UC, such as etrasimod, mirikizumab, ozanimod, and vedolizumab SC. Outcomes included clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and summary statistics were generated using R (meta and metafor packages). Results: Fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria (N = 8,612). Mirikizumab demonstrated superior clinical remission rates at week 12 (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.71–2.94) compared to placebo. Etrasimod significantly improved endoscopic scores (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.43–2.68). Ozanimod yielded moderate efficacy but with higher TEAEs, including headache and elevated liver enzymes. Subcutaneous vedolizumab was comparable to intravenous administration, with favorable safety. Across agents, biologics were well tolerated; the most common adverse events included nasopharyngitis, injection site reactions, and transient liver enzyme elevations. Serious infections remained rare. Conclusion: Emerging biological therapies for UC show robust efficacy and acceptable safety profiles, offering expanded therapeutic options for patients refractory to conventional treatments. Mirikizumab and etrasimod exhibit particularly strong remission and mucosal healing benefits. This systematic review provides critical insights to inform personalized treatment approaches in IBD management.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134344.12463.4c
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1721 Efficacy and Safety of Novel Biological Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1721 Efficacy and Safety of Novel Biological Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease requiring long-term management. While conventional therapies offer relief for some, many patients remain refractory, prompting a shift toward novel biologics. Recent clinical trials have introduced agents with promising efficacy and safety profiles, but comparative clarity is lacking. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of recently approved biological therapies for moderate-to-severe UC, providing a contemporary synthesis to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched through April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating novel biologics in UC, such as etrasimod, mirikizumab, ozanimod, and vedolizumab SC. Outcomes included clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and summary statistics were generated using R (meta and metafor packages). Results: Fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria (N = 8,612). Mirikizumab demonstrated superior clinical remission rates at week 12 (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.71–2.94) compared to placebo. Etrasimod significantly improved endoscopic scores (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.43–2.68). Ozanimod yielded moderate efficacy but with higher TEAEs, including headache and elevated liver enzymes. Subcutaneous vedolizumab was comparable to intravenous administration, with favorable safety. Across agents, biologics were well tolerated; the most common adverse events included nasopharyngitis, injection site reactions, and transient liver enzyme elevations. Serious infections remained rare. Conclusion: Emerging biological therapies for UC show robust efficacy and acceptable safety profiles, offering expanded therapeutic options for patients refractory to conventional treatments. Mirikizumab and etrasimod exhibit particularly strong remission and mucosal healing benefits. This systematic review provides critical insights to inform personalized treatment approaches in IBD management.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S1721 Efficacy and Safety of Novel Biological Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS