An Integrated Analysis of Board Structure and Executive Compensation at Meta Platforms Inc.

The role of responsible corporate governance is critical in ensuring long term performance, ethical integrity and accountability for technology companies. The paper is a study report for evaluating the governance system of Meta Platforms Inc. with special consideration on the structural quality and operating effectiveness of the board as well as its executive compensation programs. Leveraging contemporary governance theory, comparative industry best practices, and empirical findings, the analysis reveals continued governance shortcomings at Meta—including the concentration of power in the dual executive roles, weak board independence, and a reliance on equity-based incentives without strong long-term performance requirements. These inefficiencies have dramatic impact on how organizations behave, revenues and investor confidence. The corporate sector, this paper recommends, should reinforce governance resilience and sustainability through a menu of reforms focused on board independence, compensation alignment, and stakeholder engagement. Meta’s case is not only introduced as a special diagnosis; it is viewed in the context of corporate governance literature and founder-led, innovation-based companies.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522501031/pdf
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Integrated Analysis of Board Structure and Executive Compensation at Meta Platforms Inc.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

An Integrated Analysis of Board Structure and Executive Compensation at Meta Platforms Inc.

article en

Abstract

The role of responsible corporate governance is critical in ensuring long term performance, ethical integrity and accountability for technology companies. The paper is a study report for evaluating the governance system of Meta Platforms Inc. with special consideration on the structural quality and operating effectiveness of the board as well as its executive compensation programs. Leveraging contemporary governance theory, comparative industry best practices, and empirical findings, the analysis reveals continued governance shortcomings at Meta—including the concentration of power in the dual executive roles, weak board independence, and a reliance on equity-based incentives without strong long-term performance requirements. These inefficiencies have dramatic impact on how organizations behave, revenues and investor confidence. The corporate sector, this paper recommends, should reinforce governance resilience and sustainability through a menu of reforms focused on board independence, compensation alignment, and stakeholder engagement. Meta’s case is not only introduced as a special diagnosis; it is viewed in the context of corporate governance literature and founder-led, innovation-based companies.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.