S1285 Rwanda Endoscopy Week 2025: Expanding Endoscopic Capacity and Sustaining GI Care—Seven Years of Programmatic Impact

Introduction: The 7th Rwanda Endoscopy Week (REW 7.5) was held from March 10–14, 2025, marking the first event following Rwanda's Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) outbreak in late 2024. Originally scheduled for November 2024, REW was postponed due to the outbreak. This year's program underscored the resilience of Rwanda’s health system and its sustained commitment to expanding gastroenterology services. We present an overview of clinical activity, procedural outcomes, and system-level trends observed during REW 7.5. Methods: We prospectively collected data during REW 7.5 using a standardized survey tool. Data encompassed patient care, hands-on training, and academic workshops across 8 hospitals. A total of 899 endoscopic procedures were recorded and analyzed. Collected variables included patient demographics, anesthesia use, procedural indications, endoscopic findings (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, colon), interventions performed, and quality metrics (cecal intubation, bowel preparation quality). Results: A total of 899 procedures (mean age 45.6 years; 62.1% female) were performed across 8 locations: 822 EGDs, 70 colonoscopies, 6 endoscopic ultrasounds, and 1 ERCP. Clinical sites included district, private, military, and tertiary hospitals, reflecting an intentional expansion of endoscopy access beyond traditional referral centers. Procedures were both diagnostic and therapeutic, with interventions including 45 biopsies, 13 dilations, 6 snare polypectomies, 4 variceal ligations, and others such as clip placement. Anesthesia was used in 40.4% of cases (42.9% of EGDs, 92.9% of colonoscopies), signaling growth in procedural tolerance and safety. No procedural complications or nosocomial infections were reported. While REW 7.5 had fewer procedures than REW 6 (899 vs 1,069), this reflected temporary service disruption due to MVD. Still, the successful deployment of a binational team across 8 hospitals emphasized the durability of Rwanda’s endoscopy infrastructure. Since the inaugural REW in 2017, over 5,000 procedures have been performed. Conclusion: REW 7.5 demonstrated continued resilience, adaptability, and long-term vision of Rwanda Endoscopy Week. Despite logistical challenges, the program maintained its focus on high-quality care and training. This year’s findings underscore the need for improved triage protocols for dyspeptic patients and broader support for remote endoscopy access, anesthesia access, and GI fellowship sustainability to ensure long-term equity in procedural care delivery.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132600.95301.e5
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1285 Rwanda Endoscopy Week 2025: Expanding Endoscopic Capacity and Sustaining GI Care—Seven Years of Programmatic Impact

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

S1285 Rwanda Endoscopy Week 2025: Expanding Endoscopic Capacity and Sustaining GI Care—Seven Years of Programmatic Impact

article en

Abstract

Introduction: The 7th Rwanda Endoscopy Week (REW 7.5) was held from March 10–14, 2025, marking the first event following Rwanda's Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) outbreak in late 2024. Originally scheduled for November 2024, REW was postponed due to the outbreak. This year's program underscored the resilience of Rwanda’s health system and its sustained commitment to expanding gastroenterology services. We present an overview of clinical activity, procedural outcomes, and system-level trends observed during REW 7.5. Methods: We prospectively collected data during REW 7.5 using a standardized survey tool. Data encompassed patient care, hands-on training, and academic workshops across 8 hospitals. A total of 899 endoscopic procedures were recorded and analyzed. Collected variables included patient demographics, anesthesia use, procedural indications, endoscopic findings (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, colon), interventions performed, and quality metrics (cecal intubation, bowel preparation quality). Results: A total of 899 procedures (mean age 45.6 years; 62.1% female) were performed across 8 locations: 822 EGDs, 70 colonoscopies, 6 endoscopic ultrasounds, and 1 ERCP. Clinical sites included district, private, military, and tertiary hospitals, reflecting an intentional expansion of endoscopy access beyond traditional referral centers. Procedures were both diagnostic and therapeutic, with interventions including 45 biopsies, 13 dilations, 6 snare polypectomies, 4 variceal ligations, and others such as clip placement. Anesthesia was used in 40.4% of cases (42.9% of EGDs, 92.9% of colonoscopies), signaling growth in procedural tolerance and safety. No procedural complications or nosocomial infections were reported. While REW 7.5 had fewer procedures than REW 6 (899 vs 1,069), this reflected temporary service disruption due to MVD. Still, the successful deployment of a binational team across 8 hospitals emphasized the durability of Rwanda’s endoscopy infrastructure. Since the inaugural REW in 2017, over 5,000 procedures have been performed. Conclusion: REW 7.5 demonstrated continued resilience, adaptability, and long-term vision of Rwanda Endoscopy Week. Despite logistical challenges, the program maintained its focus on high-quality care and training. This year’s findings underscore the need for improved triage protocols for dyspeptic patients and broader support for remote endoscopy access, anesthesia access, and GI fellowship sustainability to ensure long-term equity in procedural care delivery.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.