S1716 Comparative Real-World Switch Rates of Biologics Among Patients With Crohn’s Disease

Introduction: Crohn’s disease (CD) is an immune-mediated disease characterized by relapsing and remitting gastrointestinal inflammation. Patients with CD often switch treatments due to intolerance or inadequate response. This study aims to compare switch rates of FDA approved biologics for CD over 12 months, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between switchers and non-switchers. Methods: Retrospective claims data were taken from the Merative MarketScan® database (1/2022–12/2024). Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient medical claims for CD, but no other autoimmune conditions, and initiated a biologic approved for CD. Patients needed continuous insurance enrollment for ≥6 months prior and ≥12 months post biologic initiation. Cohorts required ≥100 patients and were mutually exclusive. Switch rate was defined as the proportion of patients switching to a new biologic within the 12-month fixed follow-up after biologic initiation. Multivariate logistic regression controlled for age, gender, insurance type, index year, prior biologic use, and baseline HCRU. Results: Among patients receiving biologics (risankizumab [RZB], N = 321; ustekinumab [UST], N = 798; adalimumab [ADA], N = 791; infliximab [IFX], N = 637; vedolizumab [VDZ], N = 424), baseline demographics were similar. At baseline, patients receiving IFX had higher rates than other cohorts of perianal abscesses (18.8% vs 3.5–9.4%) and prior IBD-related hospitalizations (17.3% vs 5.7–11.2%). Biologic-naïve patients per cohort ranged from 72.0–94.1% with RZB having the lowest and ADA having the highest. Switch rates for patients receiving RZB (9.0%) were similar to UST (10.2%) and significantly lower than ADA (20.7%), IFX (17.4%) and VDZ (16.8%) over 12 months (P < 0.05). Total healthcare costs were 16% higher in switchers ($132,664) than non-switchers ($114,805). The greatest cost difference came from medical costs, which were 65% higher in switchers ($31,714) than non-switchers ($19,277). All-cause (28.1%) and IBD-related hospitalizations (20.3%) were higher in switchers than non-switchers (all-cause, 12.9%; IBD-related, 6.3%). All-cause (35.7%) and IBD-related emergency department visits (25.7%) were also higher in switchers than non-switchers (all-cause, 24.9%; IBD-related, 12.2%). Conclusion: This real-world study shows that patients receiving RZB have the lowest switch rates, and that patients who switch treatments have higher healthcare costs and HCRU.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134324.95490.bc
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1716 Comparative Real-World Switch Rates of Biologics Among Patients With Crohn’s Disease

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1716 Comparative Real-World Switch Rates of Biologics Among Patients With Crohn’s Disease

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Crohn’s disease (CD) is an immune-mediated disease characterized by relapsing and remitting gastrointestinal inflammation. Patients with CD often switch treatments due to intolerance or inadequate response. This study aims to compare switch rates of FDA approved biologics for CD over 12 months, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between switchers and non-switchers. Methods: Retrospective claims data were taken from the Merative MarketScan® database (1/2022–12/2024). Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient medical claims for CD, but no other autoimmune conditions, and initiated a biologic approved for CD. Patients needed continuous insurance enrollment for ≥6 months prior and ≥12 months post biologic initiation. Cohorts required ≥100 patients and were mutually exclusive. Switch rate was defined as the proportion of patients switching to a new biologic within the 12-month fixed follow-up after biologic initiation. Multivariate logistic regression controlled for age, gender, insurance type, index year, prior biologic use, and baseline HCRU. Results: Among patients receiving biologics (risankizumab [RZB], N = 321; ustekinumab [UST], N = 798; adalimumab [ADA], N = 791; infliximab [IFX], N = 637; vedolizumab [VDZ], N = 424), baseline demographics were similar. At baseline, patients receiving IFX had higher rates than other cohorts of perianal abscesses (18.8% vs 3.5–9.4%) and prior IBD-related hospitalizations (17.3% vs 5.7–11.2%). Biologic-naïve patients per cohort ranged from 72.0–94.1% with RZB having the lowest and ADA having the highest. Switch rates for patients receiving RZB (9.0%) were similar to UST (10.2%) and significantly lower than ADA (20.7%), IFX (17.4%) and VDZ (16.8%) over 12 months (P < 0.05). Total healthcare costs were 16% higher in switchers ($132,664) than non-switchers ($114,805). The greatest cost difference came from medical costs, which were 65% higher in switchers ($31,714) than non-switchers ($19,277). All-cause (28.1%) and IBD-related hospitalizations (20.3%) were higher in switchers than non-switchers (all-cause, 12.9%; IBD-related, 6.3%). All-cause (35.7%) and IBD-related emergency department visits (25.7%) were also higher in switchers than non-switchers (all-cause, 24.9%; IBD-related, 12.2%). Conclusion: This real-world study shows that patients receiving RZB have the lowest switch rates, and that patients who switch treatments have higher healthcare costs and HCRU.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.