S1135 Prevalence and Perception of Post-Prandial Bloating in the United States Adult Population: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey

Introduction: Bloating is among the most common gastrointestinal symptoms, yet its burden and perception in the general population remain underexplored. Using a nationally representative United States sample, we aimed to characterize the beliefs and behaviors surrounding post-prandial bloating and identify demographic patterns that may influence care-seeking behavior. Methods: An online anonymous survey of nationally representative United States (US) adults aged ≥18 was conducted in March 2025. Respondents answered questions regarding their experience and beliefs about bloating, as well as actions taken or reasons for inaction among those who viewed bloating as a potential health issue. Chi-square tests were used to examine associations between age, gender, and reported perceptions or actions. Results: Among 2,000 respondents, 22.6% reported experiencing bloating within 2 hours of eating, with a higher prevalence among females compared to males (27.0% vs 18.1%; odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-2.1). Patients older than 55 reported less bloating as compared to subjects 18-55 years (13.4% vs 28.0%, P < 0.01). Modest but significant differences were seen within four US regions. The majority of respondents with bloating (51.1%) believed that occasional bloating, gas, or stomach discomfort is normal, 29.7% considered it a sign of a deeper issue, and 19.2% were unsure. Similar proportions of males and females perceived bloating as normal (51.8% vs 50.6%, P = 0.6), with no significant regional differences. However, patients older than 55 were significantly less likely to consider bloating normal compared to younger groups (45.3% vs 54.6%, P < 0.01). Among those who believed such symptoms may indicate a deeper issue (n = 594) (75.3% reported they have addressed or would address the symptoms, with comparable rates among males and females (73.8% vs 76.9%, P = 0.5). Among those who would not address bloating, the primary barrier was uncertainty about appropriate treatment options (34.7%), followed by time constraints (26.5%). Financial limitations were cited by 23.8%, and 18.4% reported difficulty accessing gastrointestinal specialists. The results were comparable among males and females. Conclusion: Despite affecting >20% of the US adults, bloating is normalized or ignored in more than half of those affected. More than a quarter of individuals who recognize the potential seriousness of bloating still avoid seeking care. Findings highlight the need for public education and improved symptom recognition.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132000.39374.a9
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1135 Prevalence and Perception of Post-Prandial Bloating in the United States Adult Population: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S1135 Prevalence and Perception of Post-Prandial Bloating in the United States Adult Population: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Bloating is among the most common gastrointestinal symptoms, yet its burden and perception in the general population remain underexplored. Using a nationally representative United States sample, we aimed to characterize the beliefs and behaviors surrounding post-prandial bloating and identify demographic patterns that may influence care-seeking behavior. Methods: An online anonymous survey of nationally representative United States (US) adults aged ≥18 was conducted in March 2025. Respondents answered questions regarding their experience and beliefs about bloating, as well as actions taken or reasons for inaction among those who viewed bloating as a potential health issue. Chi-square tests were used to examine associations between age, gender, and reported perceptions or actions. Results: Among 2,000 respondents, 22.6% reported experiencing bloating within 2 hours of eating, with a higher prevalence among females compared to males (27.0% vs 18.1%; odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-2.1). Patients older than 55 reported less bloating as compared to subjects 18-55 years (13.4% vs 28.0%, P < 0.01). Modest but significant differences were seen within four US regions. The majority of respondents with bloating (51.1%) believed that occasional bloating, gas, or stomach discomfort is normal, 29.7% considered it a sign of a deeper issue, and 19.2% were unsure. Similar proportions of males and females perceived bloating as normal (51.8% vs 50.6%, P = 0.6), with no significant regional differences. However, patients older than 55 were significantly less likely to consider bloating normal compared to younger groups (45.3% vs 54.6%, P < 0.01). Among those who believed such symptoms may indicate a deeper issue (n = 594) (75.3% reported they have addressed or would address the symptoms, with comparable rates among males and females (73.8% vs 76.9%, P = 0.5). Among those who would not address bloating, the primary barrier was uncertainty about appropriate treatment options (34.7%), followed by time constraints (26.5%). Financial limitations were cited by 23.8%, and 18.4% reported difficulty accessing gastrointestinal specialists. The results were comparable among males and females. Conclusion: Despite affecting >20% of the US adults, bloating is normalized or ignored in more than half of those affected. More than a quarter of individuals who recognize the potential seriousness of bloating still avoid seeking care. Findings highlight the need for public education and improved symptom recognition.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.