S1430 Healthcare Inequities in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Study of Racial Disparities: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a medical emergency that requires early diagnosis and treatment. Numerous studies have documented the influence of racial disparities in healthcare, revealing significant differences in clinical outcomes across a wide range of medical conditions. We aimed to study the impact of racial disparities in GI bleed outcomes in Black/Hispanic patients compared to other races. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2020 was used to identify adult hospitalizations with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding using the appropriate ICD-10 codes. The study population was divided into 2 groups - Black/Hispanic patients in one group, and all other races in the other group. Statistical analysis with chi-square test and t-test was used to compare key clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to account for possible confounders. A P-value of 0.05 or less was assigned statistical significance. Results: A total of 2,926,039 adult hospitalizations with upper GI bleeding were identified, out of which 740,288 (25.3%) were Black or Hispanic and 2,185,751 (74.7%) belonged to other races. Black and Hispanic populations with GI bleed were likely to be younger (mean age 62 vs 68). Mortality rates were similar between both groups. However, Black/Hispanic populations were less likely to receive endoscopic intervention (aOR 0.86, P < 0.001). Among those who did receive endoscopy, early endoscopy (defined as within 48 hours) was performed in a smaller proportion of Blacks/Hispanics compared to other races. Black/Hispanic populations were more likely to receive blood transfusions (aOR 1.25, P < 0.001), ventilator support (aOR 1.43, P < 0.001), and vasopressors (aOR 1.08, P = 0.014). Conclusion: Our study highlights significant racial disparities in the management of upper GI bleeding. Blacks and Hispanics have an increased need for blood transfusions, ventilator support, and vasopressors in this population. This likely points to a more complicated clinical course and a delay in endoscopic intervention could potentially be one of the factors influencing these outcomes. Apart from affecting outcomes, these racial disparities also place a significant burden on healthcare costs. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into the underlying causes of these disparities and the development of targeted interventions to improve outcomes in minority populations with GI bleeding.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133180.96880.fb
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1430 Healthcare Inequities in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Study of Racial Disparities: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1430 Healthcare Inequities in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Study of Racial Disparities: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a medical emergency that requires early diagnosis and treatment. Numerous studies have documented the influence of racial disparities in healthcare, revealing significant differences in clinical outcomes across a wide range of medical conditions. We aimed to study the impact of racial disparities in GI bleed outcomes in Black/Hispanic patients compared to other races. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2020 was used to identify adult hospitalizations with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding using the appropriate ICD-10 codes. The study population was divided into 2 groups - Black/Hispanic patients in one group, and all other races in the other group. Statistical analysis with chi-square test and t-test was used to compare key clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to account for possible confounders. A P-value of 0.05 or less was assigned statistical significance. Results: A total of 2,926,039 adult hospitalizations with upper GI bleeding were identified, out of which 740,288 (25.3%) were Black or Hispanic and 2,185,751 (74.7%) belonged to other races. Black and Hispanic populations with GI bleed were likely to be younger (mean age 62 vs 68). Mortality rates were similar between both groups. However, Black/Hispanic populations were less likely to receive endoscopic intervention (aOR 0.86, P < 0.001). Among those who did receive endoscopy, early endoscopy (defined as within 48 hours) was performed in a smaller proportion of Blacks/Hispanics compared to other races. Black/Hispanic populations were more likely to receive blood transfusions (aOR 1.25, P < 0.001), ventilator support (aOR 1.43, P < 0.001), and vasopressors (aOR 1.08, P = 0.014). Conclusion: Our study highlights significant racial disparities in the management of upper GI bleeding. Blacks and Hispanics have an increased need for blood transfusions, ventilator support, and vasopressors in this population. This likely points to a more complicated clinical course and a delay in endoscopic intervention could potentially be one of the factors influencing these outcomes. Apart from affecting outcomes, these racial disparities also place a significant burden on healthcare costs. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into the underlying causes of these disparities and the development of targeted interventions to improve outcomes in minority populations with GI bleeding.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.