Does Village Direct Cash Assistance ( <i>BLT Dana Desa</i> ) Reduce Poverty? Evidence From the Village Fund Program in Indonesia

ABSTRACT The Indonesian government implemented a community‐based targeting approach of unconditional cash transfer for villages, namely the Direct Cash Assistance‐Village Funds ( BLT Dana Desa ), to complement the limitations of the existing poverty program targeting. This paper examines whether the program improves targeting and reduces poverty. We employed benefit incidence analysis, matching difference‐in‐differences methodology and utilized both the National Treasury and Budget System (SPAN, administrative data) and Indonesia socio‐economic survey (SUSENAS). Our results suggest that BLT Dana Desa compensates for exclusion errors arising from other social safety net programs, and it has significantly affected the people's well‐being in villages. It improves food expenditure for the poor and lowers the probability of being poor. However, we find the rich still receive the program, although it also benefits their consumption. It indicates the importance of continued better targeting of poverty reduction programs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Development Economics
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70094
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Village Direct Cash Assistance ( BLT Dana Desa ) Reduce Poverty? Evidence From the Village Fund Program in Indonesia

Review of Development Economics
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Does Village Direct Cash Assistance ( BLT Dana Desa ) Reduce Poverty? Evidence From the Village Fund Program in Indonesia

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Indonesian government implemented a community‐based targeting approach of unconditional cash transfer for villages, namely the Direct Cash Assistance‐Village Funds ( BLT Dana Desa ), to complement the limitations of the existing poverty program targeting. This paper examines whether the program improves targeting and reduces poverty. We employed benefit incidence analysis, matching difference‐in‐differences methodology and utilized both the National Treasury and Budget System (SPAN, administrative data) and Indonesia socio‐economic survey (SUSENAS). Our results suggest that BLT Dana Desa compensates for exclusion errors arising from other social safety net programs, and it has significantly affected the people's well‐being in villages. It improves food expenditure for the poor and lowers the probability of being poor. However, we find the rich still receive the program, although it also benefits their consumption. It indicates the importance of continued better targeting of poverty reduction programs.

Review of Development Economics
Ministry of Finance (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.