Bioprosthetic vs. mechanical prostheses in patients aged 50–70 years undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery: outcomes analysis from propensity score matching

Patients aged 50-70 years who underwent mechanical valve SAVR had lower risk of all-cause mortality and MACE compared with those who received a bioprosthesis, despite higher bleeding risk. Randomized comparisons are necessary to confirm these findings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal Open
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf153
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioprosthetic vs. mechanical prostheses in patients aged 50–70 years undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery: outcomes analysis from propensity score matching

European Heart Journal Open
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Bioprosthetic vs. mechanical prostheses in patients aged 50–70 years undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery: outcomes analysis from propensity score matching

article en

Abstract

Patients aged 50-70 years who underwent mechanical valve SAVR had lower risk of all-cause mortality and MACE compared with those who received a bioprosthesis, despite higher bleeding risk. Randomized comparisons are necessary to confirm these findings.

European Heart Journal OpenVol. 6(1)
The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Washington (US), Curtin University (AU), Royal Perth Hospital (AU), Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research (AU), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), Monash University (AU)
Queensland Health, Clinical Excellence Commission
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.