Diagnostic Efficacy of Brush Cytology in the Evaluation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Strictures: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India

Background: Endoscopic evaluation is critical in assessing the cause of obstructive jaundice. Biliary brushings during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) are widely used for obtaining a tissue sample. This study was undertaken to investigate the role of endoscopic biliary tract brush cytology as a diagnostic tool in extrahepatic biliary strictures. Materials and Methods: During the 6-year study period, 80 jaundiced patients underwent ERCP (n=63) / PTC (n=17) along with cytological evaluation of biliary brushings. Demographic data and relevant clinico-radiological details were retrospectively retrieved from institutional records. The corresponding cytological smears were re-evaluated and classified as: (i) unsatisfactory/inadequate; (ii) negative (including benign and reactive); (iii) suspicious for malignancy; (iv) positive for malignancy. Cytology results were compared with final diagnosis (defined as either definitive tissue diagnosis or clinico-radiological follow-up), and sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) were calculated. Results: The age group of patients ranged from 15 to 85 years, with mean age of presentation being 52.7 years. Cytologic diagnosis was: positive for malignancy in 23 (26.7%), suspicious in 8 (9.3%), and benign/reactive/negative in 52 (60.5%) cases. In the 61 cases where the final diagnosis was available, the overall SN, SP, PPV, NPV, and DA of biliary brush cytology were 68.57%, 92.31%, 92.31%, 68.57%, and 78.69%, respectively. There was no significant difference in DA of brushings obtained at ERCP compared to those from PTC. Conclusion: We found directly-smeared brush cytology to be diagnostically reliable, moderately sensitive, and highly specific for diagnosing common bile duct lesions encountered at ERCP/PTC.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3528
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Efficacy of Brush Cytology in the Evaluation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Strictures: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India

Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Diagnostic Efficacy of Brush Cytology in the Evaluation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Strictures: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India

article en

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic evaluation is critical in assessing the cause of obstructive jaundice. Biliary brushings during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) are widely used for obtaining a tissue sample. This study was undertaken to investigate the role of endoscopic biliary tract brush cytology as a diagnostic tool in extrahepatic biliary strictures. Materials and Methods: During the 6-year study period, 80 jaundiced patients underwent ERCP (n=63) / PTC (n=17) along with cytological evaluation of biliary brushings. Demographic data and relevant clinico-radiological details were retrospectively retrieved from institutional records. The corresponding cytological smears were re-evaluated and classified as: (i) unsatisfactory/inadequate; (ii) negative (including benign and reactive); (iii) suspicious for malignancy; (iv) positive for malignancy. Cytology results were compared with final diagnosis (defined as either definitive tissue diagnosis or clinico-radiological follow-up), and sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) were calculated. Results: The age group of patients ranged from 15 to 85 years, with mean age of presentation being 52.7 years. Cytologic diagnosis was: positive for malignancy in 23 (26.7%), suspicious in 8 (9.3%), and benign/reactive/negative in 52 (60.5%) cases. In the 61 cases where the final diagnosis was available, the overall SN, SP, PPV, NPV, and DA of biliary brush cytology were 68.57%, 92.31%, 92.31%, 68.57%, and 78.69%, respectively. There was no significant difference in DA of brushings obtained at ERCP compared to those from PTC. Conclusion: We found directly-smeared brush cytology to be diagnostically reliable, moderately sensitive, and highly specific for diagnosing common bile duct lesions encountered at ERCP/PTC.

Annals of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineVol. 12(6)
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Brush Cytology in the Evaluation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Strictures: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India · Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS