S1266 Preventing Inadequate Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation With the Targeted Addition of Adjuncts: A Quality Improvement Study

Introduction: The success of colonoscopy is dependent on adequate bowel preparation (prep). Multiple strategies have been proposed to improve prep quality. We have previously reported success of using a large volume bowel prep regimen (6L of PEG-3350) for those with risk factors (92.5%) or prior inadequate prep (87.7%). However, the 6L prep is not patient friendly. This study evaluates the impact of using an alternative enhanced prep regimen consisting of combining 15 mg bisacodyl to 4L PEG-3350 on a split schedule for patients at risk for inadequate prep. Methods: This was a quality improvement project. Patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy for all indications, who were considered at high risk for inadequate bowel prep, were prescribed an enhanced regimen. High risk was defined as a history of inadequate or fair bowel prep on prior colonoscopy, or 1 or more risk factors, such as constipation, obesity, diabetes mellitus with complications, and use of laxatives, tricyclics, opiates, or GLP-1 agonists. Data was collected over 12 months after implementation of this policy. Enhanced prep regimen consisted of 15 mg bisacodyl, followed by 4L PEG-3350 on a split dose schedule (6 pm the day prior and then 5 hours prior to appointment time). For all other patients, standard prep was 4L PEG prep on a split-dose schedule was given. Primary outcome was adequate cleansing defined as Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) of 6 or higher, with a score of 2 or higher in each segment. Results: Of 2027 outpatient colonoscopies performed during the study period, 446 high risk patients were identified (102 patients with prior inadequate prep and 344 with risk factors) and prescribed the enhanced regimen. 86.8% were males. Average age was 64. 397 (89%) of the high-risk patients had adequate bowel prep. Among the other patients, bowel prep was adequate 93% of the time (P = 0.0062) for a combined adequacy rate of 91% for all outpatient colonoscopies during that timeframe. Conclusion: This enhanced bowel prep regimen is an effective option for those identified as high-risk for inadequate prep, to help maintain overall adequate prep quality at >90% as recommended by recent guidelines. The success of the enhanced bowel regimen is still somewhat lower as compared to those without risk factors; however, this study confirms that this is a good alternative to the previously used large volume (6L) PEG-3350 regimen for those at increased risk for inadequate cleansing.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132524.04776.68
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1266 Preventing Inadequate Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation With the Targeted Addition of Adjuncts: A Quality Improvement Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S1266 Preventing Inadequate Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation With the Targeted Addition of Adjuncts: A Quality Improvement Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: The success of colonoscopy is dependent on adequate bowel preparation (prep). Multiple strategies have been proposed to improve prep quality. We have previously reported success of using a large volume bowel prep regimen (6L of PEG-3350) for those with risk factors (92.5%) or prior inadequate prep (87.7%). However, the 6L prep is not patient friendly. This study evaluates the impact of using an alternative enhanced prep regimen consisting of combining 15 mg bisacodyl to 4L PEG-3350 on a split schedule for patients at risk for inadequate prep. Methods: This was a quality improvement project. Patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy for all indications, who were considered at high risk for inadequate bowel prep, were prescribed an enhanced regimen. High risk was defined as a history of inadequate or fair bowel prep on prior colonoscopy, or 1 or more risk factors, such as constipation, obesity, diabetes mellitus with complications, and use of laxatives, tricyclics, opiates, or GLP-1 agonists. Data was collected over 12 months after implementation of this policy. Enhanced prep regimen consisted of 15 mg bisacodyl, followed by 4L PEG-3350 on a split dose schedule (6 pm the day prior and then 5 hours prior to appointment time). For all other patients, standard prep was 4L PEG prep on a split-dose schedule was given. Primary outcome was adequate cleansing defined as Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) of 6 or higher, with a score of 2 or higher in each segment. Results: Of 2027 outpatient colonoscopies performed during the study period, 446 high risk patients were identified (102 patients with prior inadequate prep and 344 with risk factors) and prescribed the enhanced regimen. 86.8% were males. Average age was 64. 397 (89%) of the high-risk patients had adequate bowel prep. Among the other patients, bowel prep was adequate 93% of the time (P = 0.0062) for a combined adequacy rate of 91% for all outpatient colonoscopies during that timeframe. Conclusion: This enhanced bowel prep regimen is an effective option for those identified as high-risk for inadequate prep, to help maintain overall adequate prep quality at >90% as recommended by recent guidelines. The success of the enhanced bowel regimen is still somewhat lower as compared to those without risk factors; however, this study confirms that this is a good alternative to the previously used large volume (6L) PEG-3350 regimen for those at increased risk for inadequate cleansing.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.