From Learning to Thinking: Cultivating Critical Skills in Higher Education
Higher education institutions now make critical thinking and problem-solving abilities their main educational targets for student development. The article combines current research about student-focused teaching methods with survey data from a basic student poll which investigates their preferred teaching approaches for critical thinking development. Research from 2010 to 2025 shows that student engagement and higher-order thinking abilities improve through active learning methods which include problem-based learning (PBL) and flipped classrooms and team-based learning and structured classroom discussions. Research studies across different fields show that these educational approaches lead to better academic results and more effective learning than conventional lecture-based teaching methods. The research indicates that educational programs which focus on critical thinking development produce students who become more capable of handling complex situations. The research findings show that educational institutions should use interactive learning methods together with supportive classroom environments to develop critical thinking abilities effectively. The research establishes future investigation paths by focusing on creating standardized critical thinking evaluation methods and studying educational technology applications. The research team conducted a brief survey among undergraduate students to determine which teaching approaches they believe enhance their critical thinking abilities. The review unites current research to help higher education institutions transition from memorization-based teaching to active development of independent analytical thinkers.
Institutions
- Arkalyk State Pedagogical Institute named after Ibrai Altynsarin (KZ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-12-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17870276
- Primary Topic
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00