Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of Timber and Masonry Buildings

Reducing the carbon footprint in the construction sector represents a key step toward achieving global climate goals. The building industry is one of the most significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, thereby playing a major role in climate change. With increasing demands for environmental sustainability, growing attention is being paid to the ecological profile of various construction materials and systems. This paper focuses on comparing the carbon footprint of two distinct types of residential buildings: timber and traditional masonry, with the aim of identifying their environmental impacts through the application of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The analysis includes the production phase of construction materials. The study’s results indicate that timber buildings have a significant potential to reduce the overall carbon footprint, primarily due to the lower energy demand for material production. In addition, wood acts as a carbon sink during its growth, which further decreases the total carbon emissions associated with the building.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566701010/pdf
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of Timber and Masonry Buildings

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of Timber and Masonry Buildings

article en

Abstract

Reducing the carbon footprint in the construction sector represents a key step toward achieving global climate goals. The building industry is one of the most significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, thereby playing a major role in climate change. With increasing demands for environmental sustainability, growing attention is being paid to the ecological profile of various construction materials and systems. This paper focuses on comparing the carbon footprint of two distinct types of residential buildings: timber and traditional masonry, with the aim of identifying their environmental impacts through the application of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The analysis includes the production phase of construction materials. The study’s results indicate that timber buildings have a significant potential to reduce the overall carbon footprint, primarily due to the lower energy demand for material production. In addition, wood acts as a carbon sink during its growth, which further decreases the total carbon emissions associated with the building.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.