S1428 The Role of CTA Embolization in Managing Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Comprehensive Review of Post-Embolization Risks

Introduction: CTA (computed tomography angiography) is a diagnostic tool widely used in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding. This study aims to evaluate the technical and clinical success rates of CTA embolization and assess the associated risks of rebleeding, re-embolization, surgery, endoscopy, and mortality. We analyze pooled data from various studies to determine the effectiveness of CTA in treating gastrointestinal bleeding and the factors influencing these outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies reporting on CTA outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. The random effects model was employed to calculate pooled event rates, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I² statistics used to assess heterogeneity. P-values were calculated for significant differences across outcomes. Results: The pooled event rate for CTA embolization technical success was 93.8% (95% CI: 86.4%–97.3%; P < 0.001). Clinical success followed a similar trend, with a pooled rate of 81.5% (95% CI: 71.0%–88.7%; P < 0.001). However, the risk of rebleeding post-embolization was significant, with a pooled event rate of 19.3% (95% CI: 15.2-24.3; P < 0.05). The risk of re-embolization was 6.7% (95% CI: 4.0-11.0; P < 0.05), and the rate of patients requiring surgery was 10.0% (95% CI: 5.5-18.0; P < 0.05). The need for endoscopy after embolization occurred in 4.1% of cases (95% CI: 1.7-9.4; P < 0.05). The pooled mortality rate was 1.5% (95% CI: 1.07-2.0; P < 0.05). Conclusion: CTA embolization demonstrates high technical and clinical success rates. However, the risk of rebleeding and the need for further interventions, such as re-embolization, surgery, and endoscopy, remain considerable. These findings underscore the importance of close monitoring and additional management strategies to optimize outcomes in gastrointestinal bleeding treatment.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133172.49933.c7
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1428 The Role of CTA Embolization in Managing Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Comprehensive Review of Post-Embolization Risks

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1428 The Role of CTA Embolization in Managing Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Comprehensive Review of Post-Embolization Risks

article en

Abstract

Introduction: CTA (computed tomography angiography) is a diagnostic tool widely used in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding. This study aims to evaluate the technical and clinical success rates of CTA embolization and assess the associated risks of rebleeding, re-embolization, surgery, endoscopy, and mortality. We analyze pooled data from various studies to determine the effectiveness of CTA in treating gastrointestinal bleeding and the factors influencing these outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies reporting on CTA outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. The random effects model was employed to calculate pooled event rates, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I² statistics used to assess heterogeneity. P-values were calculated for significant differences across outcomes. Results: The pooled event rate for CTA embolization technical success was 93.8% (95% CI: 86.4%–97.3%; P < 0.001). Clinical success followed a similar trend, with a pooled rate of 81.5% (95% CI: 71.0%–88.7%; P < 0.001). However, the risk of rebleeding post-embolization was significant, with a pooled event rate of 19.3% (95% CI: 15.2-24.3; P < 0.05). The risk of re-embolization was 6.7% (95% CI: 4.0-11.0; P < 0.05), and the rate of patients requiring surgery was 10.0% (95% CI: 5.5-18.0; P < 0.05). The need for endoscopy after embolization occurred in 4.1% of cases (95% CI: 1.7-9.4; P < 0.05). The pooled mortality rate was 1.5% (95% CI: 1.07-2.0; P < 0.05). Conclusion: CTA embolization demonstrates high technical and clinical success rates. However, the risk of rebleeding and the need for further interventions, such as re-embolization, surgery, and endoscopy, remain considerable. These findings underscore the importance of close monitoring and additional management strategies to optimize outcomes in gastrointestinal bleeding treatment.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S1428 The Role of CTA Embolization in Managing Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Comprehensive Review of Post-Embolization Risks · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS