Life cycle assessment and design methodology of sustainable grs structures using marginal fill and high performances draining geogrids

Traditional Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil (GRS) systems often use high-quality, expensive imported granular fill as structural backfill. Limited local availability of such fill leads to resource depletion and increased carbon emissions from quarrying. The construction industry is now seeking sustainable alternatives to maintain GRS integrity while mitigating environmental impacts. The use of locally available marginal fill offers a sustainable solution, conserving natural resources, reducing waste and disposal costs, and lowering the carbon footprint. When combined with high-performance draining geogrids that integrate reinforcement with drainage, this approach enhances both environmental sustainability and structural performance. The dual function of this system improves the longevity and stability of structures, reducing maintenance needs and playing a key role in project life cycle assessment. This study presents a detailed comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) between traditional reinforced slopes and environmentally friendly GRS structures, providing information on structural design methodology to boost confidence in using marginal fills for reinforced soil systems.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566205003/pdf
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment and design methodology of sustainable grs structures using marginal fill and high performances draining geogrids

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Life cycle assessment and design methodology of sustainable grs structures using marginal fill and high performances draining geogrids

article en

Abstract

Traditional Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil (GRS) systems often use high-quality, expensive imported granular fill as structural backfill. Limited local availability of such fill leads to resource depletion and increased carbon emissions from quarrying. The construction industry is now seeking sustainable alternatives to maintain GRS integrity while mitigating environmental impacts. The use of locally available marginal fill offers a sustainable solution, conserving natural resources, reducing waste and disposal costs, and lowering the carbon footprint. When combined with high-performance draining geogrids that integrate reinforcement with drainage, this approach enhances both environmental sustainability and structural performance. The dual function of this system improves the longevity and stability of structures, reducing maintenance needs and playing a key role in project life cycle assessment. This study presents a detailed comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) between traditional reinforced slopes and environmentally friendly GRS structures, providing information on structural design methodology to boost confidence in using marginal fills for reinforced soil systems.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.