Unveiling the truth: are farmers ready for smart agriculture? Insights from a hybrid PLS-SEM-ANN approach

Purpose Adopting smart farming technologies (SFTs) remains limited among farmers, especially in developing nations. While this is often attributed to resistance to technological change, farmers’ true technology readiness (TR) has been insufficiently explored. Moreover, existing research on TR’s antecedents has narrowly focused on demographic factors and past experiences, neglecting broader environmental influences. Therefore, this study aims to propose a novel framework grounded in the stimulus–organism–response (SOR) model, examining how various drivers and barriers shape farmers’ TR and, in turn, their intention to adopt SFTs. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 351 farmers and analyzed using a hybrid partial least squares (PLS)–structural equation modeling–artificial neural network (PLS-SEM-ANN) approach. This integrated method reveals linear and nonlinear interactions, offering deeper insights into the factors influencing TR and adoption intention. Findings Perceived efficiency, facilitating conditions and financial incentives substantially boost positive readiness (motivators), whereas perceived cost, complexity and uncertainty reinforce negative readiness (inhibitors). Motivators strongly predict farmers’ adoption intentions of SFTs, overshadowing any deterrent effect from inhibitors. The ANN analysis validated most PLS-SEM findings while offering deeper insights into the nuanced roles of cost and uncertainty in shaping negative readiness. These results challenge the notion that farmers are inherently resistant to innovation, suggesting that when supportive conditions exist, adoption likelihood increases significantly. Originality/value By extending the SOR model to the context of SFT adoption, this study is the first, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to expand the scope of TR antecedents to include psychological and environmental factors. It also provides fresh evidence that fostering a positive, innovation-driven mindset is more impactful than merely reducing barriers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modelling in Management
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-03-2025-0094
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the truth: are farmers ready for smart agriculture? Insights from a hybrid PLS-SEM-ANN approach

3 citations
Journal of Modelling in Management
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
article

Unveiling the truth: are farmers ready for smart agriculture? Insights from a hybrid PLS-SEM-ANN approach

article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose Adopting smart farming technologies (SFTs) remains limited among farmers, especially in developing nations. While this is often attributed to resistance to technological change, farmers’ true technology readiness (TR) has been insufficiently explored. Moreover, existing research on TR’s antecedents has narrowly focused on demographic factors and past experiences, neglecting broader environmental influences. Therefore, this study aims to propose a novel framework grounded in the stimulus–organism–response (SOR) model, examining how various drivers and barriers shape farmers’ TR and, in turn, their intention to adopt SFTs. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 351 farmers and analyzed using a hybrid partial least squares (PLS)–structural equation modeling–artificial neural network (PLS-SEM-ANN) approach. This integrated method reveals linear and nonlinear interactions, offering deeper insights into the factors influencing TR and adoption intention. Findings Perceived efficiency, facilitating conditions and financial incentives substantially boost positive readiness (motivators), whereas perceived cost, complexity and uncertainty reinforce negative readiness (inhibitors). Motivators strongly predict farmers’ adoption intentions of SFTs, overshadowing any deterrent effect from inhibitors. The ANN analysis validated most PLS-SEM findings while offering deeper insights into the nuanced roles of cost and uncertainty in shaping negative readiness. These results challenge the notion that farmers are inherently resistant to innovation, suggesting that when supportive conditions exist, adoption likelihood increases significantly. Originality/value By extending the SOR model to the context of SFT adoption, this study is the first, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to expand the scope of TR antecedents to include psychological and environmental factors. It also provides fresh evidence that fostering a positive, innovation-driven mindset is more impactful than merely reducing barriers.

Journal of Modelling in ManagementVol. 21(1)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), University of Nottingham (GB), Multimedia University (MY), Daffodil International University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.