Assessing Depth Anything V2 monocular depth estimation as a LiDAR alternative in robotics

This paper evaluates the performance of Depth Anything V2, a deep learning-based monocular depth estimation model, as a low-cost alternative to LiDAR for robotic depth sensing. LiDAR, while widely used, is expensive, prompting the search for affordable solutions. Six datasets were recorded in indoor environments to assess the performance of the pre-trained metric depth model. Qualitative analysis showed that overall relative depth is well estimated, but fine details and close-range depths in feature-sparse areas are not represented well. Quantitative analysis revealed variability in performance across datasets, with mean errors ranging from 0.32 m to 0.66 m. Additionally, performance varies with distance. For objects within 2 m, 89.1% of errors are within ±0.5 m. This decreases to 77.0% for objects within 4 m and further drops to 70.8% for objects within 6 m. Depth Anything V2 demonstrates higher pixel resolution than LiDAR but with significantly reduced metric depth accuracy. While not suitable for high-precision applications like indoor navigation and obstacle avoidance, the model can still provide useful depth information in scenarios where fine-grained accuracy is less critical.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541704002/pdf
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Depth Anything V2 monocular depth estimation as a LiDAR alternative in robotics

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Assessing Depth Anything V2 monocular depth estimation as a LiDAR alternative in robotics

article en

Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of Depth Anything V2, a deep learning-based monocular depth estimation model, as a low-cost alternative to LiDAR for robotic depth sensing. LiDAR, while widely used, is expensive, prompting the search for affordable solutions. Six datasets were recorded in indoor environments to assess the performance of the pre-trained metric depth model. Qualitative analysis showed that overall relative depth is well estimated, but fine details and close-range depths in feature-sparse areas are not represented well. Quantitative analysis revealed variability in performance across datasets, with mean errors ranging from 0.32 m to 0.66 m. Additionally, performance varies with distance. For objects within 2 m, 89.1% of errors are within ±0.5 m. This decreases to 77.0% for objects within 4 m and further drops to 70.8% for objects within 6 m. Depth Anything V2 demonstrates higher pixel resolution than LiDAR but with significantly reduced metric depth accuracy. While not suitable for high-precision applications like indoor navigation and obstacle avoidance, the model can still provide useful depth information in scenarios where fine-grained accuracy is less critical.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Depth Anything V2 monocular depth estimation as a LiDAR alternative in robotics · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS