Media Representation of the KPK in News Coverage: A Faircloughian Critical Discourse Analysis

This research aims to analyze how the online media outlets Kompas and Tempo portray the image of the Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi or KPK) during its working meetings held in Yogyakarta. Using a descriptive qualitative method and applying Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the study investigates media representation across three analytical dimensions: text, discursive practice, and sociocultural practice. The findings reveal that in the textual dimension, Kompas constructs a positive image of the KPK by using supportive language and justifying the Commission’s actions. At the same time, Tempo presents a negative portrayal, often highlighting ethical concerns and public criticism. At the level of discursive practice, Kompas maintains a balanced reporting style, occasionally aligning with government perspectives. In contrast, Tempo reinforces its reputation for investigative journalism by critically scrutinizing the KPK’s decisions. On the sociocultural level, Kompas seeks to preserve the KPK’s legitimacy following the controversial revision of its governing law in 2019, while Tempo critiques the Commission’s choice to hold a high-profile meeting during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, framing it as insensitive to public health and economic challenges. This study demonstrates that media discourse plays a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions of government institutions, particularly during times of crisis. The study highlights how ideological and linguistic strategies influence narratives, underscoring the importance of critical media literacy and the accountability role of journalism.