Understanding airflow for enhancing Sepair performance

In this study, a laboratory-scale negative pressure fluidization air gravity separation unit was employed to conduct air velocity tests. Subsequently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling was utilized to gain insights into the airflow profile and associated properties. The investigation examined three distinct airflow intensities corresponding to low, medium, and high suction fan settings of 10, 30, and 50 Hz. These airflow measurements were conducted across four sections of the suction nozzle: the fan-side (FS) inlet, other-side (OS) inlet, connecting pipe, and fluidizing box. The comparison between the modelled and experimental velocities reveals a significant level of agreement, as evidenced by high coefficients of determination (R2) which provide an indication of the extent to which the experimental variable explains the variation in the response variable. However, some deviations were observed in the predicted variables, as indicated by the root mean square error (RMSE), which indicates the predictive capability of the regression model in estimating the value of the response variable. The RMSE must be observed in the context of the actual airflows, which it represents in that if the RMSE is significantly lower than the observed airflow, the predictive capability of the regression model is considered accurate. Specifically, for the low flow system of 10 Hz, the R2 and RMSE values were determined as 0.95 and 1.13 m/s respectively. Similarly, for the medium flow system of 30 Hz, the R2 and RMSE values were found to be 0.93 and 4.09, respectively. Lastly, for the high-flow system, the R2 and RMSE values were obtained as 0.94 and 6.78, respectively. The comparison of the RMSE to the average observed velocity in the inlets and connecting separating units indicates that the predictive capability of the model is good, with minimal deviation in the predicted and observed variables. The similarity between the RMSE and the velocity in the fluidizing box shows a lower accuracy of the predicted values in this section.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541601004/pdf
Primary Topic
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding airflow for enhancing Sepair performance

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
article

Understanding airflow for enhancing Sepair performance

article en

Abstract

In this study, a laboratory-scale negative pressure fluidization air gravity separation unit was employed to conduct air velocity tests. Subsequently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling was utilized to gain insights into the airflow profile and associated properties. The investigation examined three distinct airflow intensities corresponding to low, medium, and high suction fan settings of 10, 30, and 50 Hz. These airflow measurements were conducted across four sections of the suction nozzle: the fan-side (FS) inlet, other-side (OS) inlet, connecting pipe, and fluidizing box. The comparison between the modelled and experimental velocities reveals a significant level of agreement, as evidenced by high coefficients of determination (R2) which provide an indication of the extent to which the experimental variable explains the variation in the response variable. However, some deviations were observed in the predicted variables, as indicated by the root mean square error (RMSE), which indicates the predictive capability of the regression model in estimating the value of the response variable. The RMSE must be observed in the context of the actual airflows, which it represents in that if the RMSE is significantly lower than the observed airflow, the predictive capability of the regression model is considered accurate. Specifically, for the low flow system of 10 Hz, the R2 and RMSE values were determined as 0.95 and 1.13 m/s respectively. Similarly, for the medium flow system of 30 Hz, the R2 and RMSE values were found to be 0.93 and 4.09, respectively. Lastly, for the high-flow system, the R2 and RMSE values were obtained as 0.94 and 6.78, respectively. The comparison of the RMSE to the average observed velocity in the inlets and connecting separating units indicates that the predictive capability of the model is good, with minimal deviation in the predicted and observed variables. The similarity between the RMSE and the velocity in the fluidizing box shows a lower accuracy of the predicted values in this section.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.