Cusp catastrophe models for students’ conceptual understanding of the rational numbers

This study investigates students’ understanding of rational numbers within Complex Dynamical Systems (CDS) framework examining the effect of two cognitive variable: logical thinking or formal reasoning and field dependence-independence. Participants (N=202) were low secondary education students in seventh to nineth grade, who were taking a mandatory course in mathematics. The hypothesis concerns potential nonlinear effects in learning outcomes and conceptual understanding of rational numbers, which were explored via catastrophe models. The analysis of empirical data showed that the cusp models were superior to the linear alternatives. The linear combination of the two control variables, formal reasoning and field dependence-independence, and specifically their sum and their difference acted as bifurcation and asymmetry factors respectively. The discontinuities in students’ conceptual understanding support the hypothesis regarding a stepwise conceptual change and add to nonlinear literature and to mathematics education having important implications for learning theories and teaching

Publication Details

Journal
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26262/ijce.v6i1.10851
Primary Topic
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cusp catastrophe models for students’ conceptual understanding of the rational numbers

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
article

Cusp catastrophe models for students’ conceptual understanding of the rational numbers

article en

Abstract

This study investigates students’ understanding of rational numbers within Complex Dynamical Systems (CDS) framework examining the effect of two cognitive variable: logical thinking or formal reasoning and field dependence-independence. Participants (N=202) were low secondary education students in seventh to nineth grade, who were taking a mandatory course in mathematics. The hypothesis concerns potential nonlinear effects in learning outcomes and conceptual understanding of rational numbers, which were explored via catastrophe models. The analysis of empirical data showed that the cusp models were superior to the linear alternatives. The linear combination of the two control variables, formal reasoning and field dependence-independence, and specifically their sum and their difference acted as bifurcation and asymmetry factors respectively. The discontinuities in students’ conceptual understanding support the hypothesis regarding a stepwise conceptual change and add to nonlinear literature and to mathematics education having important implications for learning theories and teaching

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.