S1309 Patients With Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension Have Worse Outcomes Following Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy When Treated at Low-Volume Hospitals

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) and pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) are high-risk cardiopulmonary conditions associated with worse patient outcomes. There is limited data for patients with HF and PHTN undergoing diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or colonoscopy. We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients with HF or PHTN undergoing EGDs or colonoscopies and explored the interaction with hospital volume. Methods: Patients with HF and/or PHTN who underwent EGD or colonoscopy between 2016 and 2021 were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Hospitals were divided into quartiles (quartile 1 = lowest volume, quartile 4 = highest volume) based on the annual number of endoscopic procedures performed. Multivariable regression analyses were used to compare outcomes by hospital volume after controlling for potential confounders. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest and prolonged length of stay. Outcomes were reported as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The analysis cohort consisted of 81,725 patients with HF and/or PHTN who underwent EGD or colonoscopy during the study period. There was a higher proportion of females (55% vs 45%, P < 0.001). Among patients with HF and PHTN undergoing EGD, the adjusted odds of death were highest in the lowest-volume hospitals (quartile 1, OR = 1.115 (1.05-1.19), P = 0.01). The same trend was observed for cardiac arrest (quartile 1, OR 1.380 (1.25-1.52), p 0.005). No difference in mortality or cardiac arrest was observed in the higher-volume hospitals (quartiles 3 and 4). Among patients undergoing colonoscopy, a similar trend of worse outcomes in quartile 1 hospitals was observed. Patients with PHTN and HF treated at the lowest-volume hospitals had increased odds of mortality (OR 1.19, CI 1.07-1.30, P = 0.02), cardiac arrest (OR 1.82, CI 1.69-2.07, P = 0.0046) and prolonged LOS (OR 1.66, CI 1.67-1.72, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Patients with HF and/or PHTN undergoing EGD or colonoscopy in low volume hospitals have worse outcomes compared to similar risk patients treated at higher volume hospitals. These results suggest a volume-outcome relationship, which may be related to the availability of specialist care, including cardiac anesthesia, leading to expertise and competence in caring for these high-risk patients.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132696.35174.6d
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1309 Patients With Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension Have Worse Outcomes Following Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy When Treated at Low-Volume Hospitals

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S1309 Patients With Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension Have Worse Outcomes Following Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy When Treated at Low-Volume Hospitals

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) and pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) are high-risk cardiopulmonary conditions associated with worse patient outcomes. There is limited data for patients with HF and PHTN undergoing diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or colonoscopy. We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients with HF or PHTN undergoing EGDs or colonoscopies and explored the interaction with hospital volume. Methods: Patients with HF and/or PHTN who underwent EGD or colonoscopy between 2016 and 2021 were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Hospitals were divided into quartiles (quartile 1 = lowest volume, quartile 4 = highest volume) based on the annual number of endoscopic procedures performed. Multivariable regression analyses were used to compare outcomes by hospital volume after controlling for potential confounders. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest and prolonged length of stay. Outcomes were reported as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The analysis cohort consisted of 81,725 patients with HF and/or PHTN who underwent EGD or colonoscopy during the study period. There was a higher proportion of females (55% vs 45%, P < 0.001). Among patients with HF and PHTN undergoing EGD, the adjusted odds of death were highest in the lowest-volume hospitals (quartile 1, OR = 1.115 (1.05-1.19), P = 0.01). The same trend was observed for cardiac arrest (quartile 1, OR 1.380 (1.25-1.52), p 0.005). No difference in mortality or cardiac arrest was observed in the higher-volume hospitals (quartiles 3 and 4). Among patients undergoing colonoscopy, a similar trend of worse outcomes in quartile 1 hospitals was observed. Patients with PHTN and HF treated at the lowest-volume hospitals had increased odds of mortality (OR 1.19, CI 1.07-1.30, P = 0.02), cardiac arrest (OR 1.82, CI 1.69-2.07, P = 0.0046) and prolonged LOS (OR 1.66, CI 1.67-1.72, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Patients with HF and/or PHTN undergoing EGD or colonoscopy in low volume hospitals have worse outcomes compared to similar risk patients treated at higher volume hospitals. These results suggest a volume-outcome relationship, which may be related to the availability of specialist care, including cardiac anesthesia, leading to expertise and competence in caring for these high-risk patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.