Practical implementation of Depth Anything V2 as a LiDAR alternative in robotics navigation

This paper presents a systematic evaluation of monocular depth estimation (MDE) using Depth Anything V2 as an alternative to LiDAR for real-time obstacle perception in mobile robot navigation. We investigate the performance of an MDE-based perception pipeline integrated into a Nav2 navigation stack on a differential-drive robot, comparing it to a LiDAR baseline across three structured indoor courses. Qualitative analyses reveal that MDE offers superior spatial resolution, successfully capturing small obstacles often missed by sparsely sampled LiDAR beams. However, challenges such as localisation inaccuracies at long range and edge-induced artefacts are observed, particularly when the camera is forward-facing. These issues are significantly mitigated when using a high camera view angle, which reduces artefact streaking and improves localisation accuracy. Quantitative results show that the MDE system achieves comparable navigation performance to LiDAR, with similar travel distances, path consistency, and replanning deviation, despite greater variability in obstacle localization. The robot successfully achieved collision-free operation in all trials, demonstrating that MDE is a viable modality for local planning in structured environments. This work highlights the potential of vision-based depth estimation to complement or replace LiDAR in resource-constrained robotics applications and identifies key directions for improving its reliability and deployment efficiency.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541704003/pdf
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical implementation of Depth Anything V2 as a LiDAR alternative in robotics navigation

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Practical implementation of Depth Anything V2 as a LiDAR alternative in robotics navigation

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic evaluation of monocular depth estimation (MDE) using Depth Anything V2 as an alternative to LiDAR for real-time obstacle perception in mobile robot navigation. We investigate the performance of an MDE-based perception pipeline integrated into a Nav2 navigation stack on a differential-drive robot, comparing it to a LiDAR baseline across three structured indoor courses. Qualitative analyses reveal that MDE offers superior spatial resolution, successfully capturing small obstacles often missed by sparsely sampled LiDAR beams. However, challenges such as localisation inaccuracies at long range and edge-induced artefacts are observed, particularly when the camera is forward-facing. These issues are significantly mitigated when using a high camera view angle, which reduces artefact streaking and improves localisation accuracy. Quantitative results show that the MDE system achieves comparable navigation performance to LiDAR, with similar travel distances, path consistency, and replanning deviation, despite greater variability in obstacle localization. The robot successfully achieved collision-free operation in all trials, demonstrating that MDE is a viable modality for local planning in structured environments. This work highlights the potential of vision-based depth estimation to complement or replace LiDAR in resource-constrained robotics applications and identifies key directions for improving its reliability and deployment efficiency.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.