Vacuum Information Density as the Fundamental Geometric Scalar: UIDT v3.5: A Proposed Theoretical Framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap and Gamma-Scaling Unification

5UIDT v3.5 proposes that vacuum information density, represented by a scalar field S(x), generates the Yang-Mills mass gap via non-minimal coupling.🚀 UIDT v3.5 | 📦 DESI-Optimized Revision | 🧩 Evidence Classified 📜 | CC BY 4.0 Abstract The Unified Information-Density Theory (UIDT) version 3.5 proposes that vacuum information density, represented by a fundamental scalar field S(x), generates the Yang–Mills mass gap through non-minimal coupling to gauge dynamics. Building upon earlier formulations, this revision advances the framework from a purely theoretical construct to a phenomenologically constrained model. Canonical parameters are derived self-consistently, yielding Delta = 1.710 +/- 0.015 GeV, kappa = 0.500 +/- 0.008, and gamma ~= 16.339. These values demonstrate numerical closure and consistency with lattice QCD results. Version 3.5 integrates enhanced renormalization group analysis, BRST gauge consistency proofs, and a hierarchical vacuum energy suppression mechanism. Cosmological calibration is achieved through 2025 observational data from DESI DR2 (Dark Energy Survey Instrument) and JWST CCHP (Carnegie–Chicago Hubble Program), fixing the holographic information scale at lambda = 0.66 nm and predicting H0 = 70.4 +/- 0.16 km/s/Mpc and S8 = 0.757 +/- 0.002. A redshift-dependent gamma evolution, gamma(z) = 16.339 * (1 + 0.0003z - 0.0045z^2), provides a natural mechanism for dynamical dark energy consistent with DESI’s phantom-crossing preference. Scientific assessment classifies results as Category A (mathematically robust derivations), Category B (lattice QCD alignment), Category C (cosmological calibration), and Category D (unverified experimental proposals). UIDT v3.5 thus represents a specific, falsifiable framework requiring rigorous independent verification, offering a potential pathway toward resolving the Yang–Mills mass gap problem and unifying quantum field theory with cosmological observations. This revision transitions the theory into a phenomenologically constrained model by integrating 2025 observational data from DESI DR2 and JWST CCHP. 🏆 Core Achievements: 🧮 Mathematical Closure: Mass Gap Δ = 1.710 GeV (Residuals < 10⁻¹⁴). 🌌 Cosmological Unification: Hubble Tension resolved at H₀ = 70.4 km/s/Mpc via holographic scale λ = 0.66 nm. ⚡ Vacuum Energy: Hierarchical suppression reduces discrepancy by ~87 orders of magnitude. 1️⃣ MathematicalFoundations (Category A: Robust) Parameters derived from three coupled non-linear equations (Vacuum Stability, Schwinger-Dyson, RG Fixed-Point). 🔑 Parameter Symbol Canonical Value Status Mass Gap Δ 1.710 ± 0.015 GeV ✅ Matches Lattice QCD Invariant γ 16.339 ± 0.002 📐 Derived Constant Coupling κ 0.500 ± 0.008 🔗 RG Fixed Point 2️⃣ Gamma-Scaling Framework (Category C: Proposed) The invariant γ acts as a universal scaling factor: Q = Δ · γⁿ. 🌌 Vacuum Energy (n=-12): ρ ∝ Δ⁴ γ⁻¹² (M_W/M_Pl)² → discrepancy reduced from 10¹²⁰ to ~30. ⚛️ Electroweak Scale (n=+2): E_EW ∝ Δ γ² ≈ 456 GeV. 🧪 Electron Mass (n=-3): Prediction 0.392 MeV vs Observed 0.511 MeV (23% deviation). 3️⃣ Cosmological Predictions (DESI-Calibrated) 🌌 Hubble Constant: H₀ = 70.4 ± 0.16 km/s/Mpc (JWST CCHP, resolves Planck–SH0ES tension). 🌍 Structure Growth: S₈ = 0.757 ± 0.002 (ACT DR6, KiDS-1000). ⚡ Dynamic Dark Energy: w(z=0.5) = -0.915 (DESI DR2 phantom crossing hints). 4️⃣ Falsification Criteria (Category D) ❌ Lattice QCD excludes Δ = 1.710 GeV (>3σ). ❌ Non-detection of S-scalar resonance (1.705 GeV) at LHC/BESIII. ❌ Casimir experiments exclude +0.59% anomaly at λ = 0.66 nm. 🔁 Reproducibility & Data 💻 Primary Code: GitHub Repository 🧮 Verification: UIDT-3.5-Verification.py (Residuals < 10⁻¹⁴) 📄 Manuscript: UIDT_v3.5_Master.pdf 📚 Citation: Rietz, Philipp. (2025). Unified Information-Density Theory v3.5: DESI-Optimized Framework. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17835201 📜 License: CC BY 4.0 | 👤 Author: Philipp Rietz (ORCID: 0009-0007-4307-1609) ⚠️ Version & Integrity Notice (v3.5)This document (UIDT v3.5 Canonical) supersedes the v3.3 release. Due to critical formatting and data inconsistencies introduced by external services—contracted to assist with the author's disability—the v3.3 DOI has been permanently withdrawn to preserve scientific rigor. The author has since personally re-validated the entire framework. Version 3.5 is the sole definitive and error-free record.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17835201
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vacuum Information Density as the Fundamental Geometric Scalar: UIDT v3.5: A Proposed Theoretical Framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap and Gamma-Scaling Unification

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Vacuum Information Density as the Fundamental Geometric Scalar: UIDT v3.5: A Proposed Theoretical Framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap and Gamma-Scaling Unification

article en

Abstract

5UIDT v3.5 proposes that vacuum information density, represented by a scalar field S(x), generates the Yang-Mills mass gap via non-minimal coupling.🚀 UIDT v3.5 | 📦 DESI-Optimized Revision | 🧩 Evidence Classified 📜 | CC BY 4.0 Abstract The Unified Information-Density Theory (UIDT) version 3.5 proposes that vacuum information density, represented by a fundamental scalar field S(x), generates the Yang–Mills mass gap through non-minimal coupling to gauge dynamics. Building upon earlier formulations, this revision advances the framework from a purely theoretical construct to a phenomenologically constrained model. Canonical parameters are derived self-consistently, yielding Delta = 1.710 +/- 0.015 GeV, kappa = 0.500 +/- 0.008, and gamma ~= 16.339. These values demonstrate numerical closure and consistency with lattice QCD results. Version 3.5 integrates enhanced renormalization group analysis, BRST gauge consistency proofs, and a hierarchical vacuum energy suppression mechanism. Cosmological calibration is achieved through 2025 observational data from DESI DR2 (Dark Energy Survey Instrument) and JWST CCHP (Carnegie–Chicago Hubble Program), fixing the holographic information scale at lambda = 0.66 nm and predicting H0 = 70.4 +/- 0.16 km/s/Mpc and S8 = 0.757 +/- 0.002. A redshift-dependent gamma evolution, gamma(z) = 16.339 * (1 + 0.0003z - 0.0045z^2), provides a natural mechanism for dynamical dark energy consistent with DESI’s phantom-crossing preference. Scientific assessment classifies results as Category A (mathematically robust derivations), Category B (lattice QCD alignment), Category C (cosmological calibration), and Category D (unverified experimental proposals). UIDT v3.5 thus represents a specific, falsifiable framework requiring rigorous independent verification, offering a potential pathway toward resolving the Yang–Mills mass gap problem and unifying quantum field theory with cosmological observations. This revision transitions the theory into a phenomenologically constrained model by integrating 2025 observational data from DESI DR2 and JWST CCHP. 🏆 Core Achievements: 🧮 Mathematical Closure: Mass Gap Δ = 1.710 GeV (Residuals < 10⁻¹⁴). 🌌 Cosmological Unification: Hubble Tension resolved at H₀ = 70.4 km/s/Mpc via holographic scale λ = 0.66 nm. ⚡ Vacuum Energy: Hierarchical suppression reduces discrepancy by ~87 orders of magnitude. 1️⃣ MathematicalFoundations (Category A: Robust) Parameters derived from three coupled non-linear equations (Vacuum Stability, Schwinger-Dyson, RG Fixed-Point). 🔑 Parameter Symbol Canonical Value Status Mass Gap Δ 1.710 ± 0.015 GeV ✅ Matches Lattice QCD Invariant γ 16.339 ± 0.002 📐 Derived Constant Coupling κ 0.500 ± 0.008 🔗 RG Fixed Point 2️⃣ Gamma-Scaling Framework (Category C: Proposed) The invariant γ acts as a universal scaling factor: Q = Δ · γⁿ. 🌌 Vacuum Energy (n=-12): ρ ∝ Δ⁴ γ⁻¹² (M_W/M_Pl)² → discrepancy reduced from 10¹²⁰ to ~30. ⚛️ Electroweak Scale (n=+2): E_EW ∝ Δ γ² ≈ 456 GeV. 🧪 Electron Mass (n=-3): Prediction 0.392 MeV vs Observed 0.511 MeV (23% deviation). 3️⃣ Cosmological Predictions (DESI-Calibrated) 🌌 Hubble Constant: H₀ = 70.4 ± 0.16 km/s/Mpc (JWST CCHP, resolves Planck–SH0ES tension). 🌍 Structure Growth: S₈ = 0.757 ± 0.002 (ACT DR6, KiDS-1000). ⚡ Dynamic Dark Energy: w(z=0.5) = -0.915 (DESI DR2 phantom crossing hints). 4️⃣ Falsification Criteria (Category D) ❌ Lattice QCD excludes Δ = 1.710 GeV (>3σ). ❌ Non-detection of S-scalar resonance (1.705 GeV) at LHC/BESIII. ❌ Casimir experiments exclude +0.59% anomaly at λ = 0.66 nm. 🔁 Reproducibility & Data 💻 Primary Code: GitHub Repository 🧮 Verification: UIDT-3.5-Verification.py (Residuals < 10⁻¹⁴) 📄 Manuscript: UIDT_v3.5_Master.pdf 📚 Citation: Rietz, Philipp. (2025). Unified Information-Density Theory v3.5: DESI-Optimized Framework. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17835201 📜 License: CC BY 4.0 | 👤 Author: Philipp Rietz (ORCID: 0009-0007-4307-1609) ⚠️ Version & Integrity Notice (v3.5)This document (UIDT v3.5 Canonical) supersedes the v3.3 release. Due to critical formatting and data inconsistencies introduced by external services—contracted to assist with the author's disability—the v3.3 DOI has been permanently withdrawn to preserve scientific rigor. The author has since personally re-validated the entire framework. Version 3.5 is the sole definitive and error-free record.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.