S1498 Disparities in Advanced IBD Therapy: A Systematic Review of Area-Based Socioeconomic Influence

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who live in peripheral or lower socioeconomic areas are less likely to obtain biologic therapy and have worse clinical results than those who live in more central or affluent areas, according to several population-based studies. Significant discrepancies still exist, especially in areas with lower socioeconomic status or less healthcare resources. This study aimed to review the association between area-level socioeconomic status and access to or response to advanced therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: In May 2025, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using broad terms to identify studies evaluating area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and its association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outcomes. Eligible studies included those that reported geographically linked SES measures—such as income, education, occupation, immigrant status, or regional healthcare access—and assessed outcomes related to biologic or small molecule therapies. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Outcomes of interest included treatment initiation, adherence, and healthcare access. Results: We screened 22,677 studies and included 5 that met criteria. Study designs included 4 cohort studies and 1 cross-sectional study, conducted in Denmark, France, Spain, Germany, and Canada. Area-level socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed through various methods, including national deprivation indices, census-linked income and education data, regional access measures, and immigrant status. Three studies reported worse outcomes in lower SES groups, including delayed treatment initiation, long-term nonuse of medications, and limited access to specialists. One study showed better biologic use among immigrants, while one found no association between SES and biologic access. Definitions of SES and outcome measures were heterogeneous across studies. Conclusion: Lower area-level SES—based on income, immigrant status, or regional deprivation—was frequently associated with delayed treatment or reduced biologic use in IBD. While findings were inconsistent, disparities in access suggest a need for targeted policy and system-level interventions.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133452.10751.71
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1498 Disparities in Advanced IBD Therapy: A Systematic Review of Area-Based Socioeconomic Influence

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1498 Disparities in Advanced IBD Therapy: A Systematic Review of Area-Based Socioeconomic Influence

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who live in peripheral or lower socioeconomic areas are less likely to obtain biologic therapy and have worse clinical results than those who live in more central or affluent areas, according to several population-based studies. Significant discrepancies still exist, especially in areas with lower socioeconomic status or less healthcare resources. This study aimed to review the association between area-level socioeconomic status and access to or response to advanced therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: In May 2025, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using broad terms to identify studies evaluating area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and its association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outcomes. Eligible studies included those that reported geographically linked SES measures—such as income, education, occupation, immigrant status, or regional healthcare access—and assessed outcomes related to biologic or small molecule therapies. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Outcomes of interest included treatment initiation, adherence, and healthcare access. Results: We screened 22,677 studies and included 5 that met criteria. Study designs included 4 cohort studies and 1 cross-sectional study, conducted in Denmark, France, Spain, Germany, and Canada. Area-level socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed through various methods, including national deprivation indices, census-linked income and education data, regional access measures, and immigrant status. Three studies reported worse outcomes in lower SES groups, including delayed treatment initiation, long-term nonuse of medications, and limited access to specialists. One study showed better biologic use among immigrants, while one found no association between SES and biologic access. Definitions of SES and outcome measures were heterogeneous across studies. Conclusion: Lower area-level SES—based on income, immigrant status, or regional deprivation—was frequently associated with delayed treatment or reduced biologic use in IBD. While findings were inconsistent, disparities in access suggest a need for targeted policy and system-level interventions.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.