S1313 Rates of Infectious Complications in Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Endoscopy

Introduction: Infectious complications following endoscopic procedures occur rarely, but it is unclear if the risks are higher in neutropenic patients. Existing studies are few and show mixed results. In this study, we examine the rate of infectious adverse events in neutropenic patients undergoing endoscopic procedures and determine if the degree of neutropenia correlates with the risk of an infectious complication. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of neutropenic patients who underwent inpatient endoscopy. Patients were stratified by severity of neutropenia based on the absolute neutrophil count (ANC): mild (1,000-1,500), moderate (500-999), or severe (<500). An infectious complication was defined by the onset of new fever, bacteremia, or consolidation on chest x-ray (CXR) within 72 hours of endoscopy. Patients with known active infections or those already on antibiotics prior to endoscopy were excluded to minimize confounding. Charts were reviewed for severity and etiology of neutropenia, comorbid conditions, indication of procedure, and for any infectious complications. Multivariate regression and chi-squared subgroup analyses were performed. Results: We identified 856 neutropenic patients who underwent endoscopy between June 2018 and September 2023, of whom 543 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 patients developed an infectious complication following endoscopy: 19 with fever, 1 with bacteremia, and 5 with new consolidations on CXR. Most infectious complications occurred following upper endoscopy; however, this was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant association between the degree of neutropenia and the risk of infectious complications. There was no significant difference in the rates of infectious complications between any of the subgroups. Conclusion: Infectious complications in neutropenic patients following endoscopy have not been well characterized. We found low rates of infectious complications in our patient population (∼3.9%), with no significant association between complication rates and the degree of neutropenia, procedure type, indication, or comorbidities. These findings support the overall safety of endoscopy in this population, particularly when clinically indicated and preceded by a risk-benefit discussion. Given our limited sample size and retrospective design, larger prospective studies are needed to further validate the safety profile and guide procedural decision-making in this high-risk population.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132712.40336.c0
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1313 Rates of Infectious Complications in Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Endoscopy

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

S1313 Rates of Infectious Complications in Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Endoscopy

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Infectious complications following endoscopic procedures occur rarely, but it is unclear if the risks are higher in neutropenic patients. Existing studies are few and show mixed results. In this study, we examine the rate of infectious adverse events in neutropenic patients undergoing endoscopic procedures and determine if the degree of neutropenia correlates with the risk of an infectious complication. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of neutropenic patients who underwent inpatient endoscopy. Patients were stratified by severity of neutropenia based on the absolute neutrophil count (ANC): mild (1,000-1,500), moderate (500-999), or severe (<500). An infectious complication was defined by the onset of new fever, bacteremia, or consolidation on chest x-ray (CXR) within 72 hours of endoscopy. Patients with known active infections or those already on antibiotics prior to endoscopy were excluded to minimize confounding. Charts were reviewed for severity and etiology of neutropenia, comorbid conditions, indication of procedure, and for any infectious complications. Multivariate regression and chi-squared subgroup analyses were performed. Results: We identified 856 neutropenic patients who underwent endoscopy between June 2018 and September 2023, of whom 543 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 patients developed an infectious complication following endoscopy: 19 with fever, 1 with bacteremia, and 5 with new consolidations on CXR. Most infectious complications occurred following upper endoscopy; however, this was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant association between the degree of neutropenia and the risk of infectious complications. There was no significant difference in the rates of infectious complications between any of the subgroups. Conclusion: Infectious complications in neutropenic patients following endoscopy have not been well characterized. We found low rates of infectious complications in our patient population (∼3.9%), with no significant association between complication rates and the degree of neutropenia, procedure type, indication, or comorbidities. These findings support the overall safety of endoscopy in this population, particularly when clinically indicated and preceded by a risk-benefit discussion. Given our limited sample size and retrospective design, larger prospective studies are needed to further validate the safety profile and guide procedural decision-making in this high-risk population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.