S1617 Early Results of a New Intestinal Ultrasound Program as a Real-Time Disease Monitoring Tool in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Case Series

Introduction: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive and inexpensive point-of-care disease monitoring tool increasingly utilized in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data regarding its efficacy in US-based IBD centers newly implementing an IUS program are limited. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of IUS in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients within our institution’s new IUS program. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of adult patients >18 years old with UC who underwent IUS between July and November 2024 at Scripps Clinic. Indications for IUS were to assess disease activity or response to therapy. Data on clinical disease activity scores, endoscopic/radiographic findings, and fecal calprotectin (FC) within 6 months of IUS were collected. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess the correlation between IUS findings and recent clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical disease state. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the extent to which IUS aided in the management of UC patients. Results: A total of 40 adult patients (mean age = 43.5 years, male gender = 16) with UC (pancolonic = 24 (60%), left colon = 16 (40%)) completed IUS during the designated study period. None had prior abdominal surgeries. 45% (18/40) of patients failed at least 1 prior biologic therapy and 53% (21/40) of patients were on biologic therapy when IUS was performed. IUS examination revealed radiographic remission in 50% (20/40) of patients, while 43% (17/40) and 8% (3/40) of patients had mild-moderate left-sided colitis and pancolitis, respectively. IUS findings were concordant with clinical symptoms in 95% (38/40) of patients. IUS findings were also concordant with recent luminal disease extent/severity by colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy and FC in 100% (18/18) and 81.5% (22/27) of cases, respectively. The use of IUS aided in therapy escalation in 11 patients (27.5%), de-escalation in 5 patients (12.5%), and continuation of the same therapy in 24 patients (60%). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that early integration of IUS in an IBD program shows accurate correlation with symptoms and objective disease measures for UC and aids in clinical decision making. IUS provided valuable real-time data, which led to therapy modification in almost 40% of included patients. Data collection of IUS performed on UC patients at our institution in the past 12 months is currently underway, final report to follow.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133928.22179.2c
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1617 Early Results of a New Intestinal Ultrasound Program as a Real-Time Disease Monitoring Tool in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Case Series

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1617 Early Results of a New Intestinal Ultrasound Program as a Real-Time Disease Monitoring Tool in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Case Series

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive and inexpensive point-of-care disease monitoring tool increasingly utilized in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data regarding its efficacy in US-based IBD centers newly implementing an IUS program are limited. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of IUS in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients within our institution’s new IUS program. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of adult patients >18 years old with UC who underwent IUS between July and November 2024 at Scripps Clinic. Indications for IUS were to assess disease activity or response to therapy. Data on clinical disease activity scores, endoscopic/radiographic findings, and fecal calprotectin (FC) within 6 months of IUS were collected. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess the correlation between IUS findings and recent clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical disease state. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the extent to which IUS aided in the management of UC patients. Results: A total of 40 adult patients (mean age = 43.5 years, male gender = 16) with UC (pancolonic = 24 (60%), left colon = 16 (40%)) completed IUS during the designated study period. None had prior abdominal surgeries. 45% (18/40) of patients failed at least 1 prior biologic therapy and 53% (21/40) of patients were on biologic therapy when IUS was performed. IUS examination revealed radiographic remission in 50% (20/40) of patients, while 43% (17/40) and 8% (3/40) of patients had mild-moderate left-sided colitis and pancolitis, respectively. IUS findings were concordant with clinical symptoms in 95% (38/40) of patients. IUS findings were also concordant with recent luminal disease extent/severity by colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy and FC in 100% (18/18) and 81.5% (22/27) of cases, respectively. The use of IUS aided in therapy escalation in 11 patients (27.5%), de-escalation in 5 patients (12.5%), and continuation of the same therapy in 24 patients (60%). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that early integration of IUS in an IBD program shows accurate correlation with symptoms and objective disease measures for UC and aids in clinical decision making. IUS provided valuable real-time data, which led to therapy modification in almost 40% of included patients. Data collection of IUS performed on UC patients at our institution in the past 12 months is currently underway, final report to follow.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.