EMBODIED CORE, CULTURAL FILTER: TOWARD AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR

Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) argues that metaphorical mappings from bodily (source) domains to abstract (target) domains structure much everyday thought. Early accounts emphasized an embodied universality of primary metaphors grounded in shared sensorimotor experience [1]. More recent cross-linguistic and anthropological work, however, documents systematic cultural variation in metaphor systems and proposes mechanisms by which culture shapes metaphorical realization [3,5]. This article critiques strict universalist and radical relativist positions and proposes an Embodied–Cultural Continuum: a layered model in which a sensorimotor-derived common core supplies cognitive affordances (primary metaphors) while cultural and discursive frames act as filters that select, elaborate, or reorient particular mappings. The model is illustrated by three case studies—TIME SPACE, emotion-as-container, and argument metaphors—drawing on crosslinguistic, corpus, and neurocognitive findings. Implications for semantics, translation, and second-language pedagogy are discussed. A concise research agenda recommends combining corpus analytics, neurocognitive methods, and ethnographic documentation to delineate the continuum’s empirical boundaries.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17866979
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EMBODIED CORE, CULTURAL FILTER: TOWARD AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

EMBODIED CORE, CULTURAL FILTER: TOWARD AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR

article en

Abstract

Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) argues that metaphorical mappings from bodily (source) domains to abstract (target) domains structure much everyday thought. Early accounts emphasized an embodied universality of primary metaphors grounded in shared sensorimotor experience [1]. More recent cross-linguistic and anthropological work, however, documents systematic cultural variation in metaphor systems and proposes mechanisms by which culture shapes metaphorical realization [3,5]. This article critiques strict universalist and radical relativist positions and proposes an Embodied–Cultural Continuum: a layered model in which a sensorimotor-derived common core supplies cognitive affordances (primary metaphors) while cultural and discursive frames act as filters that select, elaborate, or reorient particular mappings. The model is illustrated by three case studies—TIME SPACE, emotion-as-container, and argument metaphors—drawing on crosslinguistic, corpus, and neurocognitive findings. Implications for semantics, translation, and second-language pedagogy are discussed. A concise research agenda recommends combining corpus analytics, neurocognitive methods, and ethnographic documentation to delineate the continuum’s empirical boundaries.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nakhchivan State University (AZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.