Dosimetric Comparison of VMAT and HDR Brachytherapy in Sparing Organs-at-Risk in Gynecological Radiation Therapy

Background & Objective: Cancer involves the abnormal and uncontrolled growth of certain cells that can spread throughout the body. This study was conducted with aims to compare whole-pelvis planning in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with boost VMAT versus Brachytherapy boost for gynecologic cancer treatment.Materials & Methods: This prospective clinical study was conducted using a convenience sampling technique involving 25 females with endometrium type intracavitary cervical cancerous tumors after hysterectomy. Each patient underwent treatment in two phases. Phase 1 entailed treating the whole pelvis with VMAT at a dose of 45 Gy. Phase 2 was administered thereafter, whereby a boost dose was added twice, each with a different technique, at a dose of 21 Gy. The first boosted technique for VMAT entailed a High-Dose-Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy. Dosimetric parameters were extracted from Dose-Volume Histograms to compare the coverage and dose-sparing of healthy tissues.Results: The mean planning treatment whole-pelvis volume was 1019.03±157.44 cm³. The Phase 1 (Ph1) plus boost VMAT delivered higher D95% dose values and D90% than Phase 1 (Ph1) plus boost HDR. The Conformity Index and homogeneity index showed that Ph1 plus boost VMAT yielded superior dose homogeneity distribution with greater conformity than Ph1 plus boost HDR, resulting in higher doses to very small target volumes. The rectal dose distribution changed between the two techniques, with the Ph1 plus boost VMAT delivering a higher biological dose. The bladder received higher D2 cm³ doses in the Ph1 plus boost VMAT technique, and the sigmoid colon received increased doses. The Ph1 plus boost VMAT yields superior dose homogeneity distribution and greater conformity than Ph1 plus boost HDR.Conclusion: The results showed differences in target coverage and organ-at-risk protection. Ph1 plus boost VMAT provided better coverage, while Ph1 plus boost HDR boosts reduced radiation exposure to organs. The boosting strategy should be personalized for optimal treatment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24200/jogcr.11.1.56
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric Comparison of VMAT and HDR Brachytherapy in Sparing Organs-at-Risk in Gynecological Radiation Therapy

Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Dosimetric Comparison of VMAT and HDR Brachytherapy in Sparing Organs-at-Risk in Gynecological Radiation Therapy

article en

Abstract

Background & Objective: Cancer involves the abnormal and uncontrolled growth of certain cells that can spread throughout the body. This study was conducted with aims to compare whole-pelvis planning in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with boost VMAT versus Brachytherapy boost for gynecologic cancer treatment.Materials & Methods: This prospective clinical study was conducted using a convenience sampling technique involving 25 females with endometrium type intracavitary cervical cancerous tumors after hysterectomy. Each patient underwent treatment in two phases. Phase 1 entailed treating the whole pelvis with VMAT at a dose of 45 Gy. Phase 2 was administered thereafter, whereby a boost dose was added twice, each with a different technique, at a dose of 21 Gy. The first boosted technique for VMAT entailed a High-Dose-Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy. Dosimetric parameters were extracted from Dose-Volume Histograms to compare the coverage and dose-sparing of healthy tissues.Results: The mean planning treatment whole-pelvis volume was 1019.03±157.44 cm³. The Phase 1 (Ph1) plus boost VMAT delivered higher D95% dose values and D90% than Phase 1 (Ph1) plus boost HDR. The Conformity Index and homogeneity index showed that Ph1 plus boost VMAT yielded superior dose homogeneity distribution with greater conformity than Ph1 plus boost HDR, resulting in higher doses to very small target volumes. The rectal dose distribution changed between the two techniques, with the Ph1 plus boost VMAT delivering a higher biological dose. The bladder received higher D2 cm³ doses in the Ph1 plus boost VMAT technique, and the sigmoid colon received increased doses. The Ph1 plus boost VMAT yields superior dose homogeneity distribution and greater conformity than Ph1 plus boost HDR.Conclusion: The results showed differences in target coverage and organ-at-risk protection. Ph1 plus boost VMAT provided better coverage, while Ph1 plus boost HDR boosts reduced radiation exposure to organs. The boosting strategy should be personalized for optimal treatment.

Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer ResearchVol. 11(1)
University of Baghdad (IQ), Cairo University (EG), Mansoura University (EG), University of Kerbala (IQ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.