Numerical Evaluation and Assessment of Key Two-Phase Flow Parameters Using Four-Sensor Probes in Bubbly Flow

Intrusive phase-detection probes remain a standard tool for local characterization of gas-liquid bubbly flows, but their accuracy is strongly affected by probe geometry and bubble-probe interaction kinematics. This work presents a Monte Carlo-based framework to evaluate four-sensor intrusive probes in bubbly flow, relaxing the classical assumptions of spherical bubbles and purely axial trajectories. Bubbles are represented as spheres or ellipsoids, a broad range of non-dimensional probe geometries are explored, and local quantities such as interfacial area concentration, bubble and flux velocities, and chord lengths are recovered from synthetic four-sensor signals. The purpose of the framework is threefold: (i) it treats four-sensor probes in a unified way for interfacial area, velocity, and chord length estimation; (ii) it includes ellipsoidal bubbles and statistically distributed incidence angles; and (iii) it yields compact correction laws and design maps expressed in terms of the spacing-to-diameter ratio ap/D, the dimensionless probe radius rp/D, and the missing ratio mr (defined as the fraction of bubbles that cross the probe footprint without being detected), which can be applied to different intrusive four-sensor probes. The numerical results show that, within a recommended geometric range 0.5≤ap/D≤2 and rp/D≤0.25 and for missing ratios mr≤0.7, the axial velocity Vz estimates the bubble centroid velocity and its projection with typical errors within ±10%, while a chord length correction CLcorr(mr) recovers the underlying chord length distribution with a residual bias of only a few percent. The proposed interfacial area correction, written solely in terms of mr, remains accurate in polydisperse bubbly flows. Outside the recommended (ap/D,rp/D) range, large probe radius or extreme tip spacing lead to velocity and chord length errors that can exceed 20-30%. Overall, the framework provides quantitative guidelines for designing and using four-sensor intrusive probes in bubbly flows and for interpreting their measurements through geometry-aware correction factors.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247490
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Evaluation and Assessment of Key Two-Phase Flow Parameters Using Four-Sensor Probes in Bubbly Flow

Sensors
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Numerical Evaluation and Assessment of Key Two-Phase Flow Parameters Using Four-Sensor Probes in Bubbly Flow

article en

Abstract

Intrusive phase-detection probes remain a standard tool for local characterization of gas-liquid bubbly flows, but their accuracy is strongly affected by probe geometry and bubble-probe interaction kinematics. This work presents a Monte Carlo-based framework to evaluate four-sensor intrusive probes in bubbly flow, relaxing the classical assumptions of spherical bubbles and purely axial trajectories. Bubbles are represented as spheres or ellipsoids, a broad range of non-dimensional probe geometries are explored, and local quantities such as interfacial area concentration, bubble and flux velocities, and chord lengths are recovered from synthetic four-sensor signals. The purpose of the framework is threefold: (i) it treats four-sensor probes in a unified way for interfacial area, velocity, and chord length estimation; (ii) it includes ellipsoidal bubbles and statistically distributed incidence angles; and (iii) it yields compact correction laws and design maps expressed in terms of the spacing-to-diameter ratio ap/D, the dimensionless probe radius rp/D, and the missing ratio mr (defined as the fraction of bubbles that cross the probe footprint without being detected), which can be applied to different intrusive four-sensor probes. The numerical results show that, within a recommended geometric range 0.5≤ap/D≤2 and rp/D≤0.25 and for missing ratios mr≤0.7, the axial velocity Vz estimates the bubble centroid velocity and its projection with typical errors within ±10%, while a chord length correction CLcorr(mr) recovers the underlying chord length distribution with a residual bias of only a few percent. The proposed interfacial area correction, written solely in terms of mr, remains accurate in polydisperse bubbly flows. Outside the recommended (ap/D,rp/D) range, large probe radius or extreme tip spacing lead to velocity and chord length errors that can exceed 20-30%. Overall, the framework provides quantitative guidelines for designing and using four-sensor intrusive probes in bubbly flows and for interpreting their measurements through geometry-aware correction factors.

SensorsVol. 25(24)
Universitat Jaume I (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerical Evaluation and Assessment of Key Two-Phase Flow Parameters Using Four-Sensor Probes in Bubbly Flow · Sensors (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS