Economic efficiency of cereal production under push-pull technology and non-push-pull farms in Eastern Africa region

Most governments in SSA are struggling to secure food security for the citizens focusing mainly on cereal crops which is the main staple food in most households. Efforts have been made to promote agricultural intensification through adoption of integrated technologies such as push-pull technology (PPT) which was introduced by the international Centre of insect physiology and ecology (icipe) in early 1990s. Despite the benefits associated with such technologies, a yield gap in cereal production still exists due to inefficiencies in production. The current study sought to evaluate the economic efficiency of maize production under the PPT and non-PPT sub-plots using data from 5 study countries (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Ethiopia). A parametric Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) was used and the three estimated models were significant with goodness of fit. Sub-plot area, cost of fertilizer and chemicals had positive impact on economic efficiency for both PPT and non-PPT models; harvesting and threshing labour was positive for non-PPT; ploughing cost was positive or PPT and weeding labour negative for non-PPT. Variables on stemborer infestation, and land preparation methods were the main idiosyncratic variables that had either a positive of negative effect on economic efficiency. Credit and extension constraint, PPT use, gender, household size and country variable were significant. These results give insight into the areas which require attention in order to increase economic efficiency, improve productivity and enhance sustainable food systems that can support food security.

Publication Details

Journal
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.365923
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic efficiency of cereal production under push-pull technology and non-push-pull farms in Eastern Africa region

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Economic efficiency of cereal production under push-pull technology and non-push-pull farms in Eastern Africa region

article en

Abstract

Most governments in SSA are struggling to secure food security for the citizens focusing mainly on cereal crops which is the main staple food in most households. Efforts have been made to promote agricultural intensification through adoption of integrated technologies such as push-pull technology (PPT) which was introduced by the international Centre of insect physiology and ecology (icipe) in early 1990s. Despite the benefits associated with such technologies, a yield gap in cereal production still exists due to inefficiencies in production. The current study sought to evaluate the economic efficiency of maize production under the PPT and non-PPT sub-plots using data from 5 study countries (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Ethiopia). A parametric Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) was used and the three estimated models were significant with goodness of fit. Sub-plot area, cost of fertilizer and chemicals had positive impact on economic efficiency for both PPT and non-PPT models; harvesting and threshing labour was positive for non-PPT; ploughing cost was positive or PPT and weeding labour negative for non-PPT. Variables on stemborer infestation, and land preparation methods were the main idiosyncratic variables that had either a positive of negative effect on economic efficiency. Credit and extension constraint, PPT use, gender, household size and country variable were significant. These results give insight into the areas which require attention in order to increase economic efficiency, improve productivity and enhance sustainable food systems that can support food security.

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.