S1641 Determinants of Eating Disorders Among Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Seven-Year Nationwide Review (2016–2022)

Introduction: Eating disorders (ED) are increasingly recognized as comorbid psychiatric conditions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), potentially influencing disease course, nutritional status, and healthcare utilization. However, contemporary national data examining trends and sociodemographic determinants of EDs in IBD patients is lacking. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done using data from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2016 and 2022 to identify hospitalizations with a principal or secondary diagnosis of IBD (Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis) and common eating disorders using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes. Baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, and socioeconomic and hospital-level factors were assessed. Logistic regression was use to identify independent determinants of ED. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Results: Among 2,300,169 IBD patients, 3,179 (0.13%) had a concurrent diagnosis of ED. Patients with concomitant ED were significantly younger, with a mean age of 38.1 years compared to 53.2 years in those without ED (P < 0.001), and were predominantly women (81.0% vs 55.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.57, P < 0.001). The ED cohort experienced a longer mean length of stay (10.04 vs 5.49 days, P < 0.001) and higher mean charges ($78,195 vs $63,075, P = 0.008). Compared to those under 18 years, those aged 18–65 years (aOR 0.61, P = 0.003) and over 65 years (aOR 0.34, P < 0.001) had lower odds of ED. Black (aOR 0.36, P < 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR 0.53, P = 0.003) patients had lower odds compared to White. The highest income quartile was associated with increased odds (aOR 1.63, P < 0.001) compared to the lowest. Compared to Medicare or Medicaid, private insurance and self-pay (aOR 1.47, P < 0.001) had higher odds of ED. Regarding IBD subtype, Crohn’s disease had a similar prevalence and distribution of ED subtypes compared to Ulcerative colitis. The prevalence of ED showed modest but steady increase, rising from 0.13% in 2016 to 0.17% in 2022. Conclusion: Although ED remain relatively uncommon among IBD patients, their prevalence has shown a gradual rise over the years. ED disproportionately affect younger, White, female IBD patients with higher socioeconomic status and are associated with prolonged hospitalizations and increased resource use. These findings highlight the need for improved psychiatric screening and multidisciplinary management strategies, particularly in high-risk subgroups.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134024.59813.99
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1641 Determinants of Eating Disorders Among Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Seven-Year Nationwide Review (2016–2022)

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1641 Determinants of Eating Disorders Among Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Seven-Year Nationwide Review (2016–2022)

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Eating disorders (ED) are increasingly recognized as comorbid psychiatric conditions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), potentially influencing disease course, nutritional status, and healthcare utilization. However, contemporary national data examining trends and sociodemographic determinants of EDs in IBD patients is lacking. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done using data from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2016 and 2022 to identify hospitalizations with a principal or secondary diagnosis of IBD (Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis) and common eating disorders using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes. Baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, and socioeconomic and hospital-level factors were assessed. Logistic regression was use to identify independent determinants of ED. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Results: Among 2,300,169 IBD patients, 3,179 (0.13%) had a concurrent diagnosis of ED. Patients with concomitant ED were significantly younger, with a mean age of 38.1 years compared to 53.2 years in those without ED (P < 0.001), and were predominantly women (81.0% vs 55.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.57, P < 0.001). The ED cohort experienced a longer mean length of stay (10.04 vs 5.49 days, P < 0.001) and higher mean charges ($78,195 vs $63,075, P = 0.008). Compared to those under 18 years, those aged 18–65 years (aOR 0.61, P = 0.003) and over 65 years (aOR 0.34, P < 0.001) had lower odds of ED. Black (aOR 0.36, P < 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR 0.53, P = 0.003) patients had lower odds compared to White. The highest income quartile was associated with increased odds (aOR 1.63, P < 0.001) compared to the lowest. Compared to Medicare or Medicaid, private insurance and self-pay (aOR 1.47, P < 0.001) had higher odds of ED. Regarding IBD subtype, Crohn’s disease had a similar prevalence and distribution of ED subtypes compared to Ulcerative colitis. The prevalence of ED showed modest but steady increase, rising from 0.13% in 2016 to 0.17% in 2022. Conclusion: Although ED remain relatively uncommon among IBD patients, their prevalence has shown a gradual rise over the years. ED disproportionately affect younger, White, female IBD patients with higher socioeconomic status and are associated with prolonged hospitalizations and increased resource use. These findings highlight the need for improved psychiatric screening and multidisciplinary management strategies, particularly in high-risk subgroups.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.