S1287 Adverse Events Associated With Over-the-Scope Clips: A 10-Year Retrospective Review From the FDA MAUDE Database

Introduction: Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) are valuable tools in gastrointestinal procedures for hemostasis, closure of perforations, or tissue resection. While effective, OTSCs have been associated with adverse events in post-marketing surveillance. This study analyzes reports from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database to identify the frequency and nature of OTSC-related complications between 2015 and 2025. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of MAUDE reports related to OTSC systems, including both Ovesco and Padlock devices. Reports were reviewed manually and categorized as device-related or patient-related adverse events using a standardized classification system. Duplicate entries were excluded. Reports with unclear narratives were classified as “other.” Frequencies and percentages were calculated for each event type. Results: A total of 149 device-related and 123 patient-related adverse events were identified. The most common device-related issues were clip deployment failure (22%), clip separation problems (10%), and defective components (12%). Patient-related adverse events included perforation (58%) and bleeding (18%), followed by pain and fistula formation. Perforations were reported more frequently with full-thickness resection devices (FTRD) than with OTSC-only systems (86% vs 32%). Death was infrequently reported and occurred only in patients with significant comorbidities. Conclusion: This 10-year review of OTSC-related adverse events highlights common complications including deployment failure, device defects, and serious outcomes such as perforation and bleeding. The higher perforation rate with FTRD highlights the importance of procedural planning and patient selection. These findings support the need for continued post-market surveillance, standardized reporting, and enhanced practitioner training to minimize risks. Future prospective studies are warranted to better identify predictive factors for complications in OTSC-based interventions.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132608.33303.ea
Primary Topic
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1287 Adverse Events Associated With Over-the-Scope Clips: A 10-Year Retrospective Review From the FDA MAUDE Database

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
article

S1287 Adverse Events Associated With Over-the-Scope Clips: A 10-Year Retrospective Review From the FDA MAUDE Database

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) are valuable tools in gastrointestinal procedures for hemostasis, closure of perforations, or tissue resection. While effective, OTSCs have been associated with adverse events in post-marketing surveillance. This study analyzes reports from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database to identify the frequency and nature of OTSC-related complications between 2015 and 2025. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of MAUDE reports related to OTSC systems, including both Ovesco and Padlock devices. Reports were reviewed manually and categorized as device-related or patient-related adverse events using a standardized classification system. Duplicate entries were excluded. Reports with unclear narratives were classified as “other.” Frequencies and percentages were calculated for each event type. Results: A total of 149 device-related and 123 patient-related adverse events were identified. The most common device-related issues were clip deployment failure (22%), clip separation problems (10%), and defective components (12%). Patient-related adverse events included perforation (58%) and bleeding (18%), followed by pain and fistula formation. Perforations were reported more frequently with full-thickness resection devices (FTRD) than with OTSC-only systems (86% vs 32%). Death was infrequently reported and occurred only in patients with significant comorbidities. Conclusion: This 10-year review of OTSC-related adverse events highlights common complications including deployment failure, device defects, and serious outcomes such as perforation and bleeding. The higher perforation rate with FTRD highlights the importance of procedural planning and patient selection. These findings support the need for continued post-market surveillance, standardized reporting, and enhanced practitioner training to minimize risks. Future prospective studies are warranted to better identify predictive factors for complications in OTSC-based interventions.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.