S1444 Treating More Than the Bleed: Exploring Iron Status and Use of Supplementation in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleed—A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Trinet-X Databases

Introduction: While the primary focus in managing gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is controlling the bleed source, addressing iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is equally critical. Without initiating iron supplementation during hospitalization, up to 70% of acute GIB patients may experience persistent IDA at 3 months, leading to significant comorbidities and an annual economic burden of up to $29,511 per patient. Although, American College of Gastroenterology guidelines recommend a restrictive blood transfusion strategy for acute GIB [maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) >7 g/dL] and emphasizes iron supplementation for chronic GIB, however, no clear guidelines exist on iron assessment and deficiency management in setting of acute GIB. This study examines the gap by analyzing data from Trinet-X database to evaluate iron status assessment and supplementation initiation practices during acute GIB hospitalization. Methods: This 5-year retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX data (2020–2024) and included adults aged ≥18 hospitalized due to acute GIB and divided into 2 cohorts: requiring red blood cell (RBC) or whole blood transfusion. We performed descriptive analysis using SQL and excel. Results: Overall, 2,656,344 patients (45.1% woman) were hospitalized with acute GIB, of which 115,325 (4.3%)patients required PRBC transfusion. Patients who received transfusions were older (mean age 66.2 vs 59.9 years) and more likely to be woman (54.2% vs 50.5%) and non-white (41.9% vs 36.2%) compared to those who did not require transfusion. Admission hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in the transfusion group (6.3 ± 3.8 g/dL) compared to the non-transfusion group (8.7 ± 4.7 g/dL), and discharge hemoglobin remained lower (7.2 ± 3.3 g/dL vs 8.3 ± 4.0 g/dL). The mean pre-transfusion hemoglobin level was 7.7 g/dL. Despite severe anemia majority of patients (88.1%) in the transfused cohort had no iron panel assessment, and only 3.7% were formally diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Furthermore, 97.2% of transfused patients did not receive iron supplementation, highlighting a large treatment gap. Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients admitted with acute GIB, blood transfusion recipients were typically older and more likely to have anemia on admission and discharge. Despite evidence of iron deficiency and a high likelihood of IDA, iron panel testing was underutilized, and iron supplementation was rarely administered.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133236.86803.39
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1444 Treating More Than the Bleed: Exploring Iron Status and Use of Supplementation in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleed—A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Trinet-X Databases

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1444 Treating More Than the Bleed: Exploring Iron Status and Use of Supplementation in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleed—A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Trinet-X Databases

article en

Abstract

Introduction: While the primary focus in managing gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is controlling the bleed source, addressing iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is equally critical. Without initiating iron supplementation during hospitalization, up to 70% of acute GIB patients may experience persistent IDA at 3 months, leading to significant comorbidities and an annual economic burden of up to $29,511 per patient. Although, American College of Gastroenterology guidelines recommend a restrictive blood transfusion strategy for acute GIB [maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) >7 g/dL] and emphasizes iron supplementation for chronic GIB, however, no clear guidelines exist on iron assessment and deficiency management in setting of acute GIB. This study examines the gap by analyzing data from Trinet-X database to evaluate iron status assessment and supplementation initiation practices during acute GIB hospitalization. Methods: This 5-year retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX data (2020–2024) and included adults aged ≥18 hospitalized due to acute GIB and divided into 2 cohorts: requiring red blood cell (RBC) or whole blood transfusion. We performed descriptive analysis using SQL and excel. Results: Overall, 2,656,344 patients (45.1% woman) were hospitalized with acute GIB, of which 115,325 (4.3%)patients required PRBC transfusion. Patients who received transfusions were older (mean age 66.2 vs 59.9 years) and more likely to be woman (54.2% vs 50.5%) and non-white (41.9% vs 36.2%) compared to those who did not require transfusion. Admission hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in the transfusion group (6.3 ± 3.8 g/dL) compared to the non-transfusion group (8.7 ± 4.7 g/dL), and discharge hemoglobin remained lower (7.2 ± 3.3 g/dL vs 8.3 ± 4.0 g/dL). The mean pre-transfusion hemoglobin level was 7.7 g/dL. Despite severe anemia majority of patients (88.1%) in the transfused cohort had no iron panel assessment, and only 3.7% were formally diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Furthermore, 97.2% of transfused patients did not receive iron supplementation, highlighting a large treatment gap. Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients admitted with acute GIB, blood transfusion recipients were typically older and more likely to have anemia on admission and discharge. Despite evidence of iron deficiency and a high likelihood of IDA, iron panel testing was underutilized, and iron supplementation was rarely administered.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.