Navigating social life cycle assessment challenges in lithium-iron-phosphate batteries

The global push for renewable energy and sustainable mobility has intensified the demand for batteries, making them essential in electric vehicles, portable electronics, and stationary energy storage applications. While their environmental footprint is widely studied, the social dimensions are not well explored. This research presents a Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) of lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries at a pilot-scale, emphasizing the social sustainability aspects of battery production and supply chains.This study investigates the socio-economic implications of raw material extraction, processing, and battery manufacturing. While cobalt-free LFP batteries offer a promising alternative to mitigate sustainability concerns, challenges persist in assessing the broader social sustainability of battery production. The study applies the S-LCA framework, integrating primary data from the pilot production line with secondary and generic data. Using a monetary flow-based impact assessment, the methodology maps economic activities to social risks across the LFP battery supply chain.A key challenge in implementing S-LCA using these databases is the reliance on a baseline economic model that often lacks robust methodologies to capture the evolving dynamics of labour rights, supply chain vulnerabilities, and local community impacts. Additionally, economic factors such as raw material price volatility further complicate the interpretation of social sustainability indicators.These challenges are particularly evident in the anode and cathode production stages, which emerge as the most significant social hotspots due to risks related to labour conditions, occupational hazards, and child labour in raw material extraction. Further obstacles include data granularity limitations, stakeholder transparency issues, and methodological constraints. Addressing these concerns requires strengthened collaboration across academia, industry, and governance to ensure a socially responsible approach to battery development.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17854651
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating social life cycle assessment challenges in lithium-iron-phosphate batteries

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Navigating social life cycle assessment challenges in lithium-iron-phosphate batteries

article en

Abstract

The global push for renewable energy and sustainable mobility has intensified the demand for batteries, making them essential in electric vehicles, portable electronics, and stationary energy storage applications. While their environmental footprint is widely studied, the social dimensions are not well explored. This research presents a Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) of lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries at a pilot-scale, emphasizing the social sustainability aspects of battery production and supply chains.This study investigates the socio-economic implications of raw material extraction, processing, and battery manufacturing. While cobalt-free LFP batteries offer a promising alternative to mitigate sustainability concerns, challenges persist in assessing the broader social sustainability of battery production. The study applies the S-LCA framework, integrating primary data from the pilot production line with secondary and generic data. Using a monetary flow-based impact assessment, the methodology maps economic activities to social risks across the LFP battery supply chain.A key challenge in implementing S-LCA using these databases is the reliance on a baseline economic model that often lacks robust methodologies to capture the evolving dynamics of labour rights, supply chain vulnerabilities, and local community impacts. Additionally, economic factors such as raw material price volatility further complicate the interpretation of social sustainability indicators.These challenges are particularly evident in the anode and cathode production stages, which emerge as the most significant social hotspots due to risks related to labour conditions, occupational hazards, and child labour in raw material extraction. Further obstacles include data granularity limitations, stakeholder transparency issues, and methodological constraints. Addressing these concerns requires strengthened collaboration across academia, industry, and governance to ensure a socially responsible approach to battery development.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Tomas Bata University in Zlín (CZ), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.