Applying Design Thinking to the Codesign of Planetary Health Curricula

ABSTRACT Background Health professionals have a responsibility to address planetary health. Consensus exists on the knowledge, skills and values required for planetary health education, yet optimal educational approaches for teaching how to include planetary health effectively in curricula are unclear. We aim to describe how we used design thinking to co‐design planetary health curricula. Approach Faculty ( n = 8), health professionals ( n = 8) and health professional students ( n = 14) representing medicine, nursing, psychology, biomedicine, pharmacy and nutrition and dietetics participated in four, 90‐min design thinking workshops over 2 months. Each workshop was followed by a 60‐min reflection with eight academic staff. Audio recordings from both the workshops and faculty reflections were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Evaluation Design thinking was valuable due to the multiple, diverse and rapid workable curriculum ideas and solutions that were generated across the three participant groups, while acknowledging aspects of complexity. Uncertainty and discomfort were generated and tolerated throughout the process, as faculty learned ‘with’ participants in the design process. This approach to design thinking created inclusive spaces that promoted participants' agency. Implications Design thinking appears to be a feasible and useful tool to address complex curriculum challenges like planetary health, where health professions students and workforce voices are crucial for curricular relevance, effectiveness and timely responses.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Teacher
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70298
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Design Thinking to the Codesign of Planetary Health Curricula

The Clinical Teacher
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Applying Design Thinking to the Codesign of Planetary Health Curricula

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Health professionals have a responsibility to address planetary health. Consensus exists on the knowledge, skills and values required for planetary health education, yet optimal educational approaches for teaching how to include planetary health effectively in curricula are unclear. We aim to describe how we used design thinking to co‐design planetary health curricula. Approach Faculty ( n = 8), health professionals ( n = 8) and health professional students ( n = 14) representing medicine, nursing, psychology, biomedicine, pharmacy and nutrition and dietetics participated in four, 90‐min design thinking workshops over 2 months. Each workshop was followed by a 60‐min reflection with eight academic staff. Audio recordings from both the workshops and faculty reflections were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Evaluation Design thinking was valuable due to the multiple, diverse and rapid workable curriculum ideas and solutions that were generated across the three participant groups, while acknowledging aspects of complexity. Uncertainty and discomfort were generated and tolerated throughout the process, as faculty learned ‘with’ participants in the design process. This approach to design thinking created inclusive spaces that promoted participants' agency. Implications Design thinking appears to be a feasible and useful tool to address complex curriculum challenges like planetary health, where health professions students and workforce voices are crucial for curricular relevance, effectiveness and timely responses.

The Clinical TeacherVol. 23(1)
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Monash Health (AU), Sustainable Development Institute (US), Monash University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.