How should scientists act? Assessing public perceptions of scientists and scientific practices and their implications for science communication

Is how science is conducted legitimate? Are scientists trustworthy? Whether the public answers “yes” to these questions is critical for science communicators. We explore how social factors affect public perceptions of the practice of science, and then test how those beliefs relate to views about how scientists engage with the public and policy making. Our results show that political ideology and religiosity affect these views. However, more importantly, respondents’ concerns about the integrity of the scientific process are the strongest predictor of views about scientists’ behavior, providing a focus area for future communication efforts in support of science-based decision making.

Publication Details

Journal
University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
Published
2024-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23080205">https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23080205</a
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How should scientists act? Assessing public perceptions of scientists and scientific practices and their implications for science communication

University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

How should scientists act? Assessing public perceptions of scientists and scientific practices and their implications for science communication

article en

Abstract

Is how science is conducted legitimate? Are scientists trustworthy? Whether the public answers “yes” to these questions is critical for science communicators. We explore how social factors affect public perceptions of the practice of science, and then test how those beliefs relate to views about how scientists engage with the public and policy making. Our results show that political ideology and religiosity affect these views. However, more importantly, respondents’ concerns about the integrity of the scientific process are the strongest predictor of views about scientists’ behavior, providing a focus area for future communication efforts in support of science-based decision making.

University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.