S1216 Plecanatide Is Efficacious in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) and Bloating: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

Introduction: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome type C (IBS-C) have abdominal symptoms, including pain and bloating, that prompt medical care. Thus, it is important to address and improve these 2 symptoms in addition to bowel movement (BM) frequency. IBS is more common in women, particularly those aged <40 y. Thus, the aim was to evaluate plecanatide in young adult women with IBS-C with bloating using a trisymptom composite endpoint (abdominal pain, bloating, and complete spontaneous BM [CSBM] frequency) at various response thresholds. Methods: Two phase 3 trials were conducted in adults with IBS-C randomized to plecanatide 3 mg, 6 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 wks. Abdominal pain (0 [“no pain”] to 10 [“worst possible pain”]), bloating (0 [“no bloating”] to 10 [“worst possible bloating”]), and CSBM occurrence were recorded daily. Data for females aged 18-40 y with any baseline bloating (score ≥1) were pooled and analyzed post hoc. Response was defined as simultaneous improvement from baseline in all 3 symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, and CSBM/wk) for ≥6 of 12 wks using several composite criteria (ie, ≥2-point [or ≥30% or ≥40%] improvement in both abdominal pain and bloating plus a ≥1 [or ≥2] CSBM increase in the same wk for ≥6 of 12 wks). Data were further stratified by baseline bloating intensity (mild [score, 1-5]; moderate/severe [score, 6-10]). Results: 651 females (median age, 31.0 y) with IBS-C and bloating (71.3% moderate/severe) were included (plecanatide 3 mg [n = 220]; 6 mg [n = 218]; placebo [n = 213]). Plecanatide 3 mg, 6 mg, and placebo group baseline mean symptom scores were 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4 for abdominal pain and 6.4, 6.5, and 6.7 for bloating, and the mean number of CSBMs/wk were 0.2, 0.3, and 0.2. Overall, a statistically significantly greater percentage of patients treated with plecanatide 3 mg or 6 mg vs placebo were trisymptom composite responders, defined using several stringent thresholds. When stratified by baseline bloating intensity, significant improvements favoring plecanatide (both doses) vs placebo were noted for most of the trisymptom composite endpoints. Plecanatide was well tolerated. Conclusion: In women (aged 18-40 y) with IBS-C and bloating, plecanatide simultaneously and significantly improved abdominal pain, bloating, and CSBM frequency at multiple thresholds. Responses were maintained regardless of baseline bloating intensity. Plecanatide appears efficacious for treating abdominal and bowel symptoms characteristic of IBS-C in this patient population.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132324.72455.c4
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1216 Plecanatide Is Efficacious in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) and Bloating: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S1216 Plecanatide Is Efficacious in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) and Bloating: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome type C (IBS-C) have abdominal symptoms, including pain and bloating, that prompt medical care. Thus, it is important to address and improve these 2 symptoms in addition to bowel movement (BM) frequency. IBS is more common in women, particularly those aged <40 y. Thus, the aim was to evaluate plecanatide in young adult women with IBS-C with bloating using a trisymptom composite endpoint (abdominal pain, bloating, and complete spontaneous BM [CSBM] frequency) at various response thresholds. Methods: Two phase 3 trials were conducted in adults with IBS-C randomized to plecanatide 3 mg, 6 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 wks. Abdominal pain (0 [“no pain”] to 10 [“worst possible pain”]), bloating (0 [“no bloating”] to 10 [“worst possible bloating”]), and CSBM occurrence were recorded daily. Data for females aged 18-40 y with any baseline bloating (score ≥1) were pooled and analyzed post hoc. Response was defined as simultaneous improvement from baseline in all 3 symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, and CSBM/wk) for ≥6 of 12 wks using several composite criteria (ie, ≥2-point [or ≥30% or ≥40%] improvement in both abdominal pain and bloating plus a ≥1 [or ≥2] CSBM increase in the same wk for ≥6 of 12 wks). Data were further stratified by baseline bloating intensity (mild [score, 1-5]; moderate/severe [score, 6-10]). Results: 651 females (median age, 31.0 y) with IBS-C and bloating (71.3% moderate/severe) were included (plecanatide 3 mg [n = 220]; 6 mg [n = 218]; placebo [n = 213]). Plecanatide 3 mg, 6 mg, and placebo group baseline mean symptom scores were 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4 for abdominal pain and 6.4, 6.5, and 6.7 for bloating, and the mean number of CSBMs/wk were 0.2, 0.3, and 0.2. Overall, a statistically significantly greater percentage of patients treated with plecanatide 3 mg or 6 mg vs placebo were trisymptom composite responders, defined using several stringent thresholds. When stratified by baseline bloating intensity, significant improvements favoring plecanatide (both doses) vs placebo were noted for most of the trisymptom composite endpoints. Plecanatide was well tolerated. Conclusion: In women (aged 18-40 y) with IBS-C and bloating, plecanatide simultaneously and significantly improved abdominal pain, bloating, and CSBM frequency at multiple thresholds. Responses were maintained regardless of baseline bloating intensity. Plecanatide appears efficacious for treating abdominal and bowel symptoms characteristic of IBS-C in this patient population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.