S1249 Defining the Skillset of a GI Hospitalist: A Multicenter Survey of Gastroenterology Faculty Assessing Competence and Comfort With Endoscopic Skills

Introduction: Gastroenterology hospitalists (GIH) have become an integral component of academic inpatient gastroenterology services, providing unique expertise in endoscopic procedures for acutely ill patients. However, the competencies that distinguish GIH from non-GIH gastroenterologists are not well defined. Understanding these skill differences is crucial for determining optimal inpatient staffing models, enhancing faculty development, and improving gastroenterology fellowship training pathways. Methods: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey among faculty at 6 academic gastroenterology programs with both GIH and non-GIH. The survey measured self-assessed comfort and procedural volume with a range of endoscopic skills relevant to inpatient care, as well as clinical and call responsibilities. Comfort was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical comparisons between GIH and non-GIH, including a subgroup of advanced endoscopists, were performed using Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test (statistical significance: P < 0.05). Results: Seventy-one faculty responded (response rate 31%), including 12 GIH and 59 non-GIH. GIH attended more weeks on inpatient service (≥10 weeks/year for all) and reported significantly greater comfort than non-GIH for every surveyed endoscopic skill. Notable differences were seen in comfort with advanced hemostasis techniques, over-the-scope clip placement, video capsule endoscopy, and PEG tube placement with gastropexy (all P < 0.001). GIH performed higher procedural volumes compared to non-GIH and demonstrated comfort levels with endoscopic maneuvers comparable to advanced endoscopists, except for video capsule endoscopy, where GIH reported higher comfort (P = 0.02). There were no differences in overnight or weekend call coverage between groups. Many GIH acquired these endoscopic skills, despite training in fellowship programs without a GIH on staff. Conclusion: GI hospitalists represent a specialized, evolving group of gastroenterologists with broad endoscopic competencies that distinguish them from non-GIH colleagues, aligning closely with some skills typically attributed to advanced endoscopists despite lack of additional formalized training. These findings emphasize the need for formal recognition of this subspecialty and structured GIH training pathways. Integrating GIH as leaders in procedural education and faculty development efforts may improve staff satisfaction, patient care quality, and fellowship training.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132456.94586.d3
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1249 Defining the Skillset of a GI Hospitalist: A Multicenter Survey of Gastroenterology Faculty Assessing Competence and Comfort With Endoscopic Skills

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

S1249 Defining the Skillset of a GI Hospitalist: A Multicenter Survey of Gastroenterology Faculty Assessing Competence and Comfort With Endoscopic Skills

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroenterology hospitalists (GIH) have become an integral component of academic inpatient gastroenterology services, providing unique expertise in endoscopic procedures for acutely ill patients. However, the competencies that distinguish GIH from non-GIH gastroenterologists are not well defined. Understanding these skill differences is crucial for determining optimal inpatient staffing models, enhancing faculty development, and improving gastroenterology fellowship training pathways. Methods: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey among faculty at 6 academic gastroenterology programs with both GIH and non-GIH. The survey measured self-assessed comfort and procedural volume with a range of endoscopic skills relevant to inpatient care, as well as clinical and call responsibilities. Comfort was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical comparisons between GIH and non-GIH, including a subgroup of advanced endoscopists, were performed using Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test (statistical significance: P < 0.05). Results: Seventy-one faculty responded (response rate 31%), including 12 GIH and 59 non-GIH. GIH attended more weeks on inpatient service (≥10 weeks/year for all) and reported significantly greater comfort than non-GIH for every surveyed endoscopic skill. Notable differences were seen in comfort with advanced hemostasis techniques, over-the-scope clip placement, video capsule endoscopy, and PEG tube placement with gastropexy (all P < 0.001). GIH performed higher procedural volumes compared to non-GIH and demonstrated comfort levels with endoscopic maneuvers comparable to advanced endoscopists, except for video capsule endoscopy, where GIH reported higher comfort (P = 0.02). There were no differences in overnight or weekend call coverage between groups. Many GIH acquired these endoscopic skills, despite training in fellowship programs without a GIH on staff. Conclusion: GI hospitalists represent a specialized, evolving group of gastroenterologists with broad endoscopic competencies that distinguish them from non-GIH colleagues, aligning closely with some skills typically attributed to advanced endoscopists despite lack of additional formalized training. These findings emphasize the need for formal recognition of this subspecialty and structured GIH training pathways. Integrating GIH as leaders in procedural education and faculty development efforts may improve staff satisfaction, patient care quality, and fellowship training.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.