Are we Different? Exploring Individual Differences in Learned Avoidance

Avoidance of potential danger is crucial to an individual’s survival, but in the absence of threat, avoidance contributes to the development and maintenance of anxiety-related psychopathology. Researchers typically study avoidance of neutral stimuli by using conditioning procedures, where participants learn to emit an experimenter-defined response (e.g., pressing a button) to avoid a threatening cue (e.g., presentation of loud noise). Although such tasks can help to discover the relevant learning mechanisms, it is unclear whether they can also reveal individual differences in learning. Here, we recruited a large sample of individuals (>400) and tested the relationships between anxiety-related characteristics (i.e., trait anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, and neuroticism) and performance in an avoidance conditioning task, where participants could avoid unpleasant cues by means of a button press. Using network and cluster analyses, we were unable to identify a strong relationship between avoidance conditioning and the individual characteristics. We discuss our findings and suggest that a paradigm shift in this experimental task is urgently needed for studying individual variations in avoidance learning.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20438087251360820
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are we Different? Exploring Individual Differences in Learned Avoidance

Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Are we Different? Exploring Individual Differences in Learned Avoidance

article en

Abstract

Avoidance of potential danger is crucial to an individual’s survival, but in the absence of threat, avoidance contributes to the development and maintenance of anxiety-related psychopathology. Researchers typically study avoidance of neutral stimuli by using conditioning procedures, where participants learn to emit an experimenter-defined response (e.g., pressing a button) to avoid a threatening cue (e.g., presentation of loud noise). Although such tasks can help to discover the relevant learning mechanisms, it is unclear whether they can also reveal individual differences in learning. Here, we recruited a large sample of individuals (>400) and tested the relationships between anxiety-related characteristics (i.e., trait anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, and neuroticism) and performance in an avoidance conditioning task, where participants could avoid unpleasant cues by means of a button press. Using network and cluster analyses, we were unable to identify a strong relationship between avoidance conditioning and the individual characteristics. We discuss our findings and suggest that a paradigm shift in this experimental task is urgently needed for studying individual variations in avoidance learning.

Journal of Experimental PsychopathologyVol. 16(4)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.