Evaluating the performance of active learning models on selective laser melting data sampling

Data acquisition in additive manufacturing, specifically selective laser melting, is always expensive and worsens when the material under study is also costly. To address this challenge, researchers use available design of experiment (DoE) tools. This marks a shift away from trial-and-error and one-factor-at-a-time approaches, which are ineffective and cause the number of required experiments to grow exponentially as the number of parameters increases. However, the traditional design of experiments struggles in analysing complex, multi-parameter, and noisy systems, inherent characteristics of selective laser melting data. Active machine learning can excel in this limited data and sophisticated field. This study evaluates the performance of active machine learning models based on neural networks and Gaussian process regression (GPR) with a D-optimal design for predicting Ti-5-5-5-3 and Beta 21S samples. This study demonstrates the ability of both active learning methods to reduce data required with improved predictability, with GPR outperforming the others. These results demonstrate the potential of GPR for effective SLM experimentation and emphasize the necessity of improving active learning based on neural networks to increase experimental accuracy with less data.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541702008/pdf
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the performance of active learning models on selective laser melting data sampling

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Evaluating the performance of active learning models on selective laser melting data sampling

article en

Abstract

Data acquisition in additive manufacturing, specifically selective laser melting, is always expensive and worsens when the material under study is also costly. To address this challenge, researchers use available design of experiment (DoE) tools. This marks a shift away from trial-and-error and one-factor-at-a-time approaches, which are ineffective and cause the number of required experiments to grow exponentially as the number of parameters increases. However, the traditional design of experiments struggles in analysing complex, multi-parameter, and noisy systems, inherent characteristics of selective laser melting data. Active machine learning can excel in this limited data and sophisticated field. This study evaluates the performance of active machine learning models based on neural networks and Gaussian process regression (GPR) with a D-optimal design for predicting Ti-5-5-5-3 and Beta 21S samples. This study demonstrates the ability of both active learning methods to reduce data required with improved predictability, with GPR outperforming the others. These results demonstrate the potential of GPR for effective SLM experimentation and emphasize the necessity of improving active learning based on neural networks to increase experimental accuracy with less data.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the performance of active learning models on selective laser melting data sampling · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS