The reliability and construct validity of the functional threshold power test in trained cyclists

The functional threshold power (FTP) 20-min test (FTP20) is popular amongst cyclists and coaches due to the theory it can predict the power output that can be sustained for 60-mins. However, little is known in terms of the reliability and validity of this construct, therefore the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the FTP20 test and the construct validity of this test to predict 60-min power. Twenty-two male trained cyclists (age = 32 ± 10 years, body mass (BM) = 77.2 ± 6.8 kg, maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) = 59.4 ± 5.6 ml.kg-1.min-1 BM) completed five trials consisting of a V̇O2max test, a familiarisation trial of the FTP20, two experimental FTP20 tests, and a time to volitional exhaustion (TLIM) at 95% FTP20. The repeatability for mean power output (MPO) during the FTP20 was excellent (r = 0.94, CI 0.82, 0.98, p<0.001). Mean TLIM (at 95% FTP20) was 42 ± 17-min, with six participants within 10-min of the 60-min suggested threshold. These results suggest that the FTP20 is reliable, however it does not predict 60-min power with a high level of validity. Future research should explore adapting the calculation of FTP whereby the intensity may be lowered (i.e., 80-90% MPO of FTP20), particularly as most participants’ TLIM was far below the suggested 60-min time frame.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Science & Cycling
Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28985/1425.jsc.06
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The reliability and construct validity of the functional threshold power test in trained cyclists

Journal Of Science & Cycling
Sports Performance and Training
article

The reliability and construct validity of the functional threshold power test in trained cyclists

article en

Abstract

The functional threshold power (FTP) 20-min test (FTP20) is popular amongst cyclists and coaches due to the theory it can predict the power output that can be sustained for 60-mins. However, little is known in terms of the reliability and validity of this construct, therefore the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the FTP20 test and the construct validity of this test to predict 60-min power. Twenty-two male trained cyclists (age = 32 ± 10 years, body mass (BM) = 77.2 ± 6.8 kg, maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) = 59.4 ± 5.6 ml.kg-1.min-1 BM) completed five trials consisting of a V̇O2max test, a familiarisation trial of the FTP20, two experimental FTP20 tests, and a time to volitional exhaustion (TLIM) at 95% FTP20. The repeatability for mean power output (MPO) during the FTP20 was excellent (r = 0.94, CI 0.82, 0.98, p<0.001). Mean TLIM (at 95% FTP20) was 42 ± 17-min, with six participants within 10-min of the 60-min suggested threshold. These results suggest that the FTP20 is reliable, however it does not predict 60-min power with a high level of validity. Future research should explore adapting the calculation of FTP whereby the intensity may be lowered (i.e., 80-90% MPO of FTP20), particularly as most participants’ TLIM was far below the suggested 60-min time frame.

Journal Of Science & Cycling
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.