Comparative LCA of Ground Floor Systems with Focus on Material Choices

This paper discusses the environmental life cycle aspects of three variants of ground floor constructions using different insulation materials: EPS thermal insulation (F1), foam glass (F2) and stone wool (F3). The objective is to analyse the environmental impacts of each variant throughout its entire life cycle using Life Cycle Assessment method. Regarding insulation materials, it can be characterizing foam glass as material with high moisture resistance, long-term stability, recycling potential and low overall environmental footprint. Stone wool offers excellent thermal insulation properties, is made from natural raw materials, has a long lifespan, and is recyclable. EPS insulation, while affordable and lightweight, has a higher environmental impact during production and disposal. The analysis shows that the environmental sustainability of these materials is largely influenced by their production processes and the potential for reuse and recycling. According to the multi-criteria decision analysis, F1 is the most suitable choice, with F3 variant ranking second and F2 identified as the least favourable option. These findings provide valuable insights for builders and architects seeking to minimise the environmental impact of floor structures.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566701004/pdf
Primary Topic
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative LCA of Ground Floor Systems with Focus on Material Choices

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
article

Comparative LCA of Ground Floor Systems with Focus on Material Choices

article en

Abstract

This paper discusses the environmental life cycle aspects of three variants of ground floor constructions using different insulation materials: EPS thermal insulation (F1), foam glass (F2) and stone wool (F3). The objective is to analyse the environmental impacts of each variant throughout its entire life cycle using Life Cycle Assessment method. Regarding insulation materials, it can be characterizing foam glass as material with high moisture resistance, long-term stability, recycling potential and low overall environmental footprint. Stone wool offers excellent thermal insulation properties, is made from natural raw materials, has a long lifespan, and is recyclable. EPS insulation, while affordable and lightweight, has a higher environmental impact during production and disposal. The analysis shows that the environmental sustainability of these materials is largely influenced by their production processes and the potential for reuse and recycling. According to the multi-criteria decision analysis, F1 is the most suitable choice, with F3 variant ranking second and F2 identified as the least favourable option. These findings provide valuable insights for builders and architects seeking to minimise the environmental impact of floor structures.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative LCA of Ground Floor Systems with Focus on Material Choices · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS