S1503 Using a Chatbot to Administer a Questionnaire in IBD: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Traditional methods of collecting patient-reported outcomes rely on patient compliance and manual workflows, such as paper forms, online portals, in-person visits, or follow-up by clinical staff. These approaches are often burdensome, especially in larger populations. This study evaluates the feasibility of using an automated chatbot to conduct scheduled phone calls and administer standardized questionnaires to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Patients were identified by previous involvement in a focus-group consisting of a similar questionnaire. Eligible patients were schedule for one-on-one phone calls via chatbot and were administered the survey which included topics related to IBD symptoms, management, barriers to care, and research engagement. Following the survey, patients were asked to compare their experience of the chatbot compared to the focus groups. Data analysis was conducted via content analysis to identify themes and sentiments. Results: Thirty-four patients (16 women, 18 men) with age of 43.8 years-old participated in the study. Twenty-three patients reports their activities were impacts relating to physical, social, general, and quality of life (QoL). 24 patients reported specific dietary restrictions including spicy, dairy, and fast foods. Environmental triggers included stress and food. Primary symptoms included physical and emotional states. Helpful treatments included medications and dietary strategies. Treatment goals included symptom management, improved QoL, and psychological care. 9 patients identified barrier like healthcare navigation, dissatisfaction with providers, and access issues to care. 14 patients reported barriers to research participation including lack of awareness, safety concerns, and accessibility. Regarding the interview format, 10 preferred the chatbot, 8 preferred to focus-groups, 11 were comfortable with either or both, and 5 gave no preference. Conclusion: This pilot study supports the feasibility in using a chatbot to collect questionnaires in individuals with IBD. Participants cited impacts of daily life, dietary habits, and social function as significant impacts. Lack of awareness, exposure and access were the primary drivers of barriers to care and research participation. Patient feedback expressed more high acceptability of the chatbot over the focus-group sessions. This pilot study offers unique insight into a scalable, acceptable, and more efficient process in gathering patient reported outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133472.99565.53
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1503 Using a Chatbot to Administer a Questionnaire in IBD: A Pilot Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

S1503 Using a Chatbot to Administer a Questionnaire in IBD: A Pilot Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional methods of collecting patient-reported outcomes rely on patient compliance and manual workflows, such as paper forms, online portals, in-person visits, or follow-up by clinical staff. These approaches are often burdensome, especially in larger populations. This study evaluates the feasibility of using an automated chatbot to conduct scheduled phone calls and administer standardized questionnaires to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Patients were identified by previous involvement in a focus-group consisting of a similar questionnaire. Eligible patients were schedule for one-on-one phone calls via chatbot and were administered the survey which included topics related to IBD symptoms, management, barriers to care, and research engagement. Following the survey, patients were asked to compare their experience of the chatbot compared to the focus groups. Data analysis was conducted via content analysis to identify themes and sentiments. Results: Thirty-four patients (16 women, 18 men) with age of 43.8 years-old participated in the study. Twenty-three patients reports their activities were impacts relating to physical, social, general, and quality of life (QoL). 24 patients reported specific dietary restrictions including spicy, dairy, and fast foods. Environmental triggers included stress and food. Primary symptoms included physical and emotional states. Helpful treatments included medications and dietary strategies. Treatment goals included symptom management, improved QoL, and psychological care. 9 patients identified barrier like healthcare navigation, dissatisfaction with providers, and access issues to care. 14 patients reported barriers to research participation including lack of awareness, safety concerns, and accessibility. Regarding the interview format, 10 preferred the chatbot, 8 preferred to focus-groups, 11 were comfortable with either or both, and 5 gave no preference. Conclusion: This pilot study supports the feasibility in using a chatbot to collect questionnaires in individuals with IBD. Participants cited impacts of daily life, dietary habits, and social function as significant impacts. Lack of awareness, exposure and access were the primary drivers of barriers to care and research participation. Patient feedback expressed more high acceptability of the chatbot over the focus-group sessions. This pilot study offers unique insight into a scalable, acceptable, and more efficient process in gathering patient reported outcomes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.