S1283 Reassessing Gastric Biopsies in Normal-Appearing Mucosa: A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Impact of Discontinuing Immunohistochemical Staining

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori can be diagnosed using both invasive and non-invasive methods. Among invasive techniques, histological analysis of gastric biopsies is the gold standard. These are typically examined with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, and Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining is often added to enhance diagnostic accuracy. However, this approach is resource-intensive, costly, and has prolonged turnaround times. As clinical practice shifts toward reducing invasive testing, especially in the setting of endoscopically normal gastric mucosa, the utility of routine biopsies and IHC staining in such cases warrants reevaluation. This study aimed to assess biopsy rates and diagnostic yield in patients with normal-appearing gastric mucosa before and after our institution discontinued IHC staining in these biopsies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study across a multicenter health system. After institutional review board approval, we reviewed all EGDs performed in 2 time periods: Sep 1–Oct 31, 2023 (control group, when IHC was performed) and Jan 1–Feb 28, 2024 (case group, after IHC was discontinued). Patients with findings of normal gastric mucosa on EGD were included. The primary outcome was biopsy rate; the secondary outcome was histologic yield for H. pylori. Results: A total of 217 patients met inclusion criteria, 102 (47%) in the control group and 115 (53%) in the case group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, race, or proton pump inhibitor use. Common EGD indications included anemia, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, heartburn, melena, and reflux, with similar distribution between groups. Gastric biopsies were taken in 72/102 (70.6%) patients in the control group vs 74/115 (64.3%) in the case group (P = 0.33). IHC staining was performed in 72 (70.6%) control patients compared to 25 (21.7%) in the case group (P < 0.01). Histology was positive for H. pylori in 15 (14.7%) control patients vs 13 (11.3%) case patients (P = 0.67). Conclusion: Reducing the use of IHC staining in biopsies from normal-appearing gastric mucosa did not affect the rate of biopsy nor the diagnostic yield for H. pylori. Despite a significant decrease in IHC utilization, detection rates remained unchanged. These findings suggest that routine biopsy and IHC staining of endoscopically normal gastric mucosa may have limited clinical value. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of invasive histologic evaluation compared to non-invasive diagnostic methods.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132592.08043.52
Primary Topic
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1283 Reassessing Gastric Biopsies in Normal-Appearing Mucosa: A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Impact of Discontinuing Immunohistochemical Staining

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
article

S1283 Reassessing Gastric Biopsies in Normal-Appearing Mucosa: A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Impact of Discontinuing Immunohistochemical Staining

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori can be diagnosed using both invasive and non-invasive methods. Among invasive techniques, histological analysis of gastric biopsies is the gold standard. These are typically examined with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, and Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining is often added to enhance diagnostic accuracy. However, this approach is resource-intensive, costly, and has prolonged turnaround times. As clinical practice shifts toward reducing invasive testing, especially in the setting of endoscopically normal gastric mucosa, the utility of routine biopsies and IHC staining in such cases warrants reevaluation. This study aimed to assess biopsy rates and diagnostic yield in patients with normal-appearing gastric mucosa before and after our institution discontinued IHC staining in these biopsies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study across a multicenter health system. After institutional review board approval, we reviewed all EGDs performed in 2 time periods: Sep 1–Oct 31, 2023 (control group, when IHC was performed) and Jan 1–Feb 28, 2024 (case group, after IHC was discontinued). Patients with findings of normal gastric mucosa on EGD were included. The primary outcome was biopsy rate; the secondary outcome was histologic yield for H. pylori. Results: A total of 217 patients met inclusion criteria, 102 (47%) in the control group and 115 (53%) in the case group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, race, or proton pump inhibitor use. Common EGD indications included anemia, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, heartburn, melena, and reflux, with similar distribution between groups. Gastric biopsies were taken in 72/102 (70.6%) patients in the control group vs 74/115 (64.3%) in the case group (P = 0.33). IHC staining was performed in 72 (70.6%) control patients compared to 25 (21.7%) in the case group (P < 0.01). Histology was positive for H. pylori in 15 (14.7%) control patients vs 13 (11.3%) case patients (P = 0.67). Conclusion: Reducing the use of IHC staining in biopsies from normal-appearing gastric mucosa did not affect the rate of biopsy nor the diagnostic yield for H. pylori. Despite a significant decrease in IHC utilization, detection rates remained unchanged. These findings suggest that routine biopsy and IHC staining of endoscopically normal gastric mucosa may have limited clinical value. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of invasive histologic evaluation compared to non-invasive diagnostic methods.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.