S1330 The Conundrum of Managing Forrest Class IIb Ulcers: Real-World Findings From 2 Large Urban Medical Centers

Introduction: Management of Forrest II ulcers varies based on endoscopic appearance. Although IIa (non-bleeding visible vessel) and IIc (flat pigmented spot) ulcers have clear guidance on endoscopic hemostatic intervention, recommendations for IIb ulcers (adherent clot) are not well defined. Our aim is to evaluate real-world adherence to guidelines for Forrest II ulcers and to assess rebleeding risk based on guideline-appropriate intervention, including IIb ulcers where intervention is indeterminate. Methods: A retrospective chart analysis was conducted on patients with Forrest II ulcers from 2019-2024 at 2 urban academic centers. Patient demographic characteristics and history of prior proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were collected from electronic records. Ulcer class, site, and endoscopic intervention were obtained from procedure reports. The primary outcome was to assess 30-day rebleeding rate based on hemostatic intervention. Chi-square analysis was conducted to evaluate variables of interest. Results: Of 172 patients with fully available data (65.7% man, mean age 67.6 years), the majority of patients had Forrest IIc ulcers (55.8%), with most located in the stomach (51.2%) or duodenum (46.5%). As per guidelines, endoscopic intervention was performed in 96.6% of Forrest IIa ulcers, while 80.2% of Forrest IIc ulcers had no intervention. Although most (61.1%) IIb ulcers were managed endoscopically, there was a higher relative overall 30-day post-endoscopy rebleeding risk (27.8%) in this group than observed in Forrest IIa (12.1%) or IIc (13.5%) ulcers. There was a lower 30-day rate of rebleeding in patients with Forrest IIb ulcers receiving intervention (18.2%) compared to IIb patients without intervention (42.9%). Of note, 30-day rebleeding rates for Forrest IIc ulcers were similar to those of IIa ulcers, regardless of intervention. Conclusion: Treatment of Forrest IIa and IIc ulcers generally followed current guidelines. Forrest IIb ulcers were much less commonly identified and provided a management dilemma, as there are no strict guidelines on the use of hemostatic therapy. These results suggest that intervention may decrease 30-day Class IIb rebleeding rates to around those seen with other Forrest II lesions. When feasible, unroofing adherent clot to expose the ulcer bed and any visible vessel may permit reclassification to IIa or IIc, and therefore provide better guidance on appropriate management with an increased risk of rebleeding.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132780.59382.1b
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1330 The Conundrum of Managing Forrest Class IIb Ulcers: Real-World Findings From 2 Large Urban Medical Centers

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1330 The Conundrum of Managing Forrest Class IIb Ulcers: Real-World Findings From 2 Large Urban Medical Centers

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Management of Forrest II ulcers varies based on endoscopic appearance. Although IIa (non-bleeding visible vessel) and IIc (flat pigmented spot) ulcers have clear guidance on endoscopic hemostatic intervention, recommendations for IIb ulcers (adherent clot) are not well defined. Our aim is to evaluate real-world adherence to guidelines for Forrest II ulcers and to assess rebleeding risk based on guideline-appropriate intervention, including IIb ulcers where intervention is indeterminate. Methods: A retrospective chart analysis was conducted on patients with Forrest II ulcers from 2019-2024 at 2 urban academic centers. Patient demographic characteristics and history of prior proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were collected from electronic records. Ulcer class, site, and endoscopic intervention were obtained from procedure reports. The primary outcome was to assess 30-day rebleeding rate based on hemostatic intervention. Chi-square analysis was conducted to evaluate variables of interest. Results: Of 172 patients with fully available data (65.7% man, mean age 67.6 years), the majority of patients had Forrest IIc ulcers (55.8%), with most located in the stomach (51.2%) or duodenum (46.5%). As per guidelines, endoscopic intervention was performed in 96.6% of Forrest IIa ulcers, while 80.2% of Forrest IIc ulcers had no intervention. Although most (61.1%) IIb ulcers were managed endoscopically, there was a higher relative overall 30-day post-endoscopy rebleeding risk (27.8%) in this group than observed in Forrest IIa (12.1%) or IIc (13.5%) ulcers. There was a lower 30-day rate of rebleeding in patients with Forrest IIb ulcers receiving intervention (18.2%) compared to IIb patients without intervention (42.9%). Of note, 30-day rebleeding rates for Forrest IIc ulcers were similar to those of IIa ulcers, regardless of intervention. Conclusion: Treatment of Forrest IIa and IIc ulcers generally followed current guidelines. Forrest IIb ulcers were much less commonly identified and provided a management dilemma, as there are no strict guidelines on the use of hemostatic therapy. These results suggest that intervention may decrease 30-day Class IIb rebleeding rates to around those seen with other Forrest II lesions. When feasible, unroofing adherent clot to expose the ulcer bed and any visible vessel may permit reclassification to IIa or IIc, and therefore provide better guidance on appropriate management with an increased risk of rebleeding.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.