PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP STYLES AND DECISION‑MAKING IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN BUEA

This article investigates how principals’ leadership styles shape decision-making processes in public secondary schools in Buea. A cross-sectional survey was completed by 629 staff (teachers and administrators) across 14 schools. Measures included a single best description of the principal’s leadership style and Likert-type items on leadership practices, teacher involvement and consultation, process effectiveness, influence on school culture, perceived student outcomes, and professional development. Transformational (39.6%) and democratic (38.2%) styles predominated; authoritarian (9.5%) and laissez-faire (12.7%) were less common. On core practices promoting contribution, providing clear directives, stressing cooperation, and communicating vision, 78–79% agreed or strongly agreed (mean≈3.67/4). Teacher involvement and consultation averaged 3.48–3.49/4, with ~78% reporting ‘Sometimes/Always’; risk-taking attracted 77.8% disagreement. Leadership style (35.0%) and teacher input (27.7%) emerged as the top decision drivers. Leadership was perceived to positively influence school culture (77.8% ‘Sometimes/Always’) and student outcomes (78.0% Positive/Very positive). The evidence is consistent with recent syntheses linking collaborative leadership with teacher engagement, organizational trust, and learning gains. Recommendations include institutionalizing professional learning communities, consultative forums, and short improvement cycles that de-risk innovation while protecting time for observation and coaching.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0989/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education Studies
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i11.6403
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP STYLES AND DECISION‑MAKING IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN BUEA

European Journal of Education Studies
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP STYLES AND DECISION‑MAKING IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN BUEA

article en

Abstract

This article investigates how principals’ leadership styles shape decision-making processes in public secondary schools in Buea. A cross-sectional survey was completed by 629 staff (teachers and administrators) across 14 schools. Measures included a single best description of the principal’s leadership style and Likert-type items on leadership practices, teacher involvement and consultation, process effectiveness, influence on school culture, perceived student outcomes, and professional development. Transformational (39.6%) and democratic (38.2%) styles predominated; authoritarian (9.5%) and laissez-faire (12.7%) were less common. On core practices promoting contribution, providing clear directives, stressing cooperation, and communicating vision, 78–79% agreed or strongly agreed (mean≈3.67/4). Teacher involvement and consultation averaged 3.48–3.49/4, with ~78% reporting ‘Sometimes/Always’; risk-taking attracted 77.8% disagreement. Leadership style (35.0%) and teacher input (27.7%) emerged as the top decision drivers. Leadership was perceived to positively influence school culture (77.8% ‘Sometimes/Always’) and student outcomes (78.0% Positive/Very positive). The evidence is consistent with recent syntheses linking collaborative leadership with teacher engagement, organizational trust, and learning gains. Recommendations include institutionalizing professional learning communities, consultative forums, and short improvement cycles that de-risk innovation while protecting time for observation and coaching.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0989/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

European Journal of Education StudiesVol. 12(11)
Université de Yaoundé I (CM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.