Evaluating the effectiveness of the Arclight: A compact solar-powered low-cost direct ophthalmoscope

Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy and utility of the Arclight device, a frugal direct ophthalmoscope, in evaluating the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) by a nonophthalmologist examiner in comparison to an expert ophthalmologist using a range of standard diagnostic tools. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with 108 participants (211 eyes) at ophthalmology clinics associated with the University of California, Irvine. A medical student (naïve nonophthalmologist examiner [NNOE]) performed fundus examinations using the Arclight whereas a pediatric ophthalmologist conducted gold standard evaluations with a combination of direct ophthalmoscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and/or slit-lamp examination. Training for the NNOE included didactic sessions on using the Arclight for fundal “red” reflex testing and fundus assessment including CDR estimation. Data collected included CDR values, ease of use (EOU, rated on a 5-point scale), and examination time. Bland–Altman analysis compared student and ophthalmologist measurements, with stratified analyses exploring performance across demographics, including age, sex, iris color, and dilation status. RESULTS: Examinations with the Arclight were successful in 76.8% (162/211) of cases. Mean CDR values by the student (0.325) aligned closely with those by the ophthalmologist (0.331, P = 0.27), with 95% agreement within ± 0.17. The Arclight performed well across most groups, with highest EOU and shortest examination times in dilated eyes. As expected, challenges were noted in younger children and those with nondilated pupils. CONCLUSION: The Arclight is a reliable, affordable, and user-friendly tool for fundoscopic examinations. Its low cost and portability make it ideal for low- and middle-income countries, supporting global efforts to reduce preventable blindness. Targeted training and technique adjustments could enhance its performance in specific populations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_98_25
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the effectiveness of the Arclight: A compact solar-powered low-cost direct ophthalmoscope

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
article

Evaluating the effectiveness of the Arclight: A compact solar-powered low-cost direct ophthalmoscope

article en

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy and utility of the Arclight device, a frugal direct ophthalmoscope, in evaluating the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) by a nonophthalmologist examiner in comparison to an expert ophthalmologist using a range of standard diagnostic tools. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with 108 participants (211 eyes) at ophthalmology clinics associated with the University of California, Irvine. A medical student (naïve nonophthalmologist examiner [NNOE]) performed fundus examinations using the Arclight whereas a pediatric ophthalmologist conducted gold standard evaluations with a combination of direct ophthalmoscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and/or slit-lamp examination. Training for the NNOE included didactic sessions on using the Arclight for fundal “red” reflex testing and fundus assessment including CDR estimation. Data collected included CDR values, ease of use (EOU, rated on a 5-point scale), and examination time. Bland–Altman analysis compared student and ophthalmologist measurements, with stratified analyses exploring performance across demographics, including age, sex, iris color, and dilation status. RESULTS: Examinations with the Arclight were successful in 76.8% (162/211) of cases. Mean CDR values by the student (0.325) aligned closely with those by the ophthalmologist (0.331, P = 0.27), with 95% agreement within ± 0.17. The Arclight performed well across most groups, with highest EOU and shortest examination times in dilated eyes. As expected, challenges were noted in younger children and those with nondilated pupils. CONCLUSION: The Arclight is a reliable, affordable, and user-friendly tool for fundoscopic examinations. Its low cost and portability make it ideal for low- and middle-income countries, supporting global efforts to reduce preventable blindness. Targeted training and technique adjustments could enhance its performance in specific populations.

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Creighton University (US), Children's Hospital of Orange County (US), University of St Andrews (GB), University of California, Irvine (US), Islamic Azad University Rasht Branch (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.