Physical therapists as first-contact providers for musculoskeletal disorders: comparing beliefs across chiropractors, nurse practitioners, Physical therapists, and physician assistants

OBJECTIVES: Physical therapists (PTs) are increasingly being integrated into first-contact roles for musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs), but various barriers exist to full implementation. Several barriers may arise from the beliefs and actions of other first-contact provider (FCP) types. Understanding how these different FCP types view their capabilities compared to PTs is essential for identifying factors that may influence first-contact PT integration. This study compared the beliefs of chiropractors, nurse practitioners (NPs), PTs, and physician assistants (PAs) regarding their ability to provide care, educational preparation, and scope of practice related to first-contact care for patients with MSKDs. METHODS: Electronic cross-sectional survey. Surveys were distributed to chiropractors, NPs, PTs, and PAs in the United States. Means, standard deviations, and Pearson's correlations were reported. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and post-hoc descriptive discriminant analyses were used to analyze results. RESULTS: Ninety-two respondents completed the survey. PTs received the highest ratings for ability to care (μ = 8.42,8.94) and educational preparation (μ = 9.03), while chiropractors received the lowest for ability to care (μ = 6.40,6.99) and educational preparation (μ = 6.53). For scope of practice, NPs and PAs were rated substantially higher than chiropractors and PTs, particularly for prescribing medication (μ = 8.30-9.51 vs 1.82-4.49). All MANOVA results were significant, with most differences being attributed to chiropractors rating their profession differently from other professions. CONCLUSION: PTs received the highest average ratings for ability to provide care and education preparation for managing patients with MSKDs as an FCP. Most differences related to the ratings of the chiropractic profession, where chiropractors rated their profession higher than others. Despite this, all FCP types generally supported each profession's ability to practice in these roles. However, most FCP types believed chiropractors and PTs should have a more limited scope of practice compared to NPs and PAs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2026.2717338
Primary Topic
Nursing Roles and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical therapists as first-contact providers for musculoskeletal disorders: comparing beliefs across chiropractors, nurse practitioners, Physical therapists, and physician assistants

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
Nursing Roles and Practices
article

Physical therapists as first-contact providers for musculoskeletal disorders: comparing beliefs across chiropractors, nurse practitioners, Physical therapists, and physician assistants

article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Physical therapists (PTs) are increasingly being integrated into first-contact roles for musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs), but various barriers exist to full implementation. Several barriers may arise from the beliefs and actions of other first-contact provider (FCP) types. Understanding how these different FCP types view their capabilities compared to PTs is essential for identifying factors that may influence first-contact PT integration. This study compared the beliefs of chiropractors, nurse practitioners (NPs), PTs, and physician assistants (PAs) regarding their ability to provide care, educational preparation, and scope of practice related to first-contact care for patients with MSKDs. METHODS: Electronic cross-sectional survey. Surveys were distributed to chiropractors, NPs, PTs, and PAs in the United States. Means, standard deviations, and Pearson's correlations were reported. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and post-hoc descriptive discriminant analyses were used to analyze results. RESULTS: Ninety-two respondents completed the survey. PTs received the highest ratings for ability to care (μ = 8.42,8.94) and educational preparation (μ = 9.03), while chiropractors received the lowest for ability to care (μ = 6.40,6.99) and educational preparation (μ = 6.53). For scope of practice, NPs and PAs were rated substantially higher than chiropractors and PTs, particularly for prescribing medication (μ = 8.30-9.51 vs 1.82-4.49). All MANOVA results were significant, with most differences being attributed to chiropractors rating their profession differently from other professions. CONCLUSION: PTs received the highest average ratings for ability to provide care and education preparation for managing patients with MSKDs as an FCP. Most differences related to the ratings of the chiropractic profession, where chiropractors rated their profession higher than others. Despite this, all FCP types generally supported each profession's ability to practice in these roles. However, most FCP types believed chiropractors and PTs should have a more limited scope of practice compared to NPs and PAs.

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
University of Mary Washington (US), University of North Dakota (US), Duro Felguera (Spain) (ES), University of Jamestown (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Nursing Roles and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.