On the Moral Duties of Voters

Voting is morally significant insofar as it is an act by which citizens indirectly exercise power over others by taking part in the causal chain that ends up shaping the laws of a country (under minimal democratic conditions). Considering this, I argue that the most fundamental duty of voters is a duty of decentration, i.e., a duty to look beyond the impact of their single vote and to acknowledge their responsibility for others when deciding whether and how to vote. From this fundamental duty, at least three more concrete duties can be derived. 1) A duty to give primary attention to non-personal considerations like justice and well-being. 2) A duty to acquire sufficient and balanced information, and to fairly engage with opposing views. 3) A duty to vote (tactically) when we have sufficient reasons to believe that we can contribute to alleviating injustice or suffering. Although these duties are demanding, they do not entail that many people should abstain, and even less that universal suffrage should be questioned. In many cases, voters will have weightier reasons to vote than to abstain. Recognizing these duties should invite us to consider institutional ways of facilitating voters’ fulfilment of their duties.

Publication Details

Journal
Lirias (KU Leuven)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2143/ep.31.3.3293951
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Moral Duties of Voters

Lirias (KU Leuven)
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

On the Moral Duties of Voters

article en

Abstract

Voting is morally significant insofar as it is an act by which citizens indirectly exercise power over others by taking part in the causal chain that ends up shaping the laws of a country (under minimal democratic conditions). Considering this, I argue that the most fundamental duty of voters is a duty of decentration, i.e., a duty to look beyond the impact of their single vote and to acknowledge their responsibility for others when deciding whether and how to vote. From this fundamental duty, at least three more concrete duties can be derived. 1) A duty to give primary attention to non-personal considerations like justice and well-being. 2) A duty to acquire sufficient and balanced information, and to fairly engage with opposing views. 3) A duty to vote (tactically) when we have sufficient reasons to believe that we can contribute to alleviating injustice or suffering. Although these duties are demanding, they do not entail that many people should abstain, and even less that universal suffrage should be questioned. In many cases, voters will have weightier reasons to vote than to abstain. Recognizing these duties should invite us to consider institutional ways of facilitating voters’ fulfilment of their duties.

Lirias (KU Leuven)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Moral Duties of Voters · Lirias (KU Leuven) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS